Article #22-1 | Gutenberg Articles

Excerpt

Excerpt from Roget's Thesaurus, by Peter Mark Roget

#608. Caprice.—N. caprice, fancy, humor; whim, whimsy,
whimsey[obs3], whimwham[obs3]; crotchet, capriccio, quirk, freak,
maggot, fad, vagary, prank, fit, flimflam, escapade, boutade[Fr],
wild-goose chase; capriciousness &c. adj.; kink. V. be capricious &c.
adj.; have a maggot in the brain; take it into one's head, strain at a
gnat and swallow a camel; blow hot and cold; play fast and loose, play
fantastic tricks; tourner casaque[Fr]. Adj. capricious; erratic,
eccentric, fitful, hysterical; full of whims &c. n.; maggoty;
inconsistent, fanciful, fantastic, whimsical, crotchety, kinky [U. S.],
particular, humorsome[obs3], freakish, skittish, wanton, wayward;
contrary; captious; arbitrary; unconformable &c. 83; penny wise and
pound foolish; fickle &c. (irresolute) 605; frivolous, sleeveless,
giddy, volatile. Adv. by fits and starts, without rhyme or reason. Phr.
nil fuit unquain sic inipar sibi[Lat]; the deuce is in him.

#609. Choice.—N. choice, option; discretion &c. (volition) 600;
preoption[obs3]; alternative; dilemma, embarras de choix[Fr]; adoption,
cooptation[obs3]; novation[obs3]; decision &c. (judgment) 480.
election; political election (politics) 737a. selection, excerption,
gleaning, eclecticism; excerpta[obs3], gleanings, cuttings, scissors
and paste; pick &c. (best) 650. preference, prelation[obs3], opinion
poll, survey; predilection &c. (desire) 865. V. offers one's choice,
set before; hold out the alternative, present the alternative, offer
the alternative; put to the vote. use option, use discretion, exercise
option, exercise discretion, one's option; adopt, take up, embrace,
espouse; choose, elect, opt for; take one's choice, make one's choice;
make choice of, fix upon. vote, poll, hold up one's hand; divide.
settle; decide &c. (adjudge) 480; list &c. (will) 600; make up one's
mind &c. (resolve) 604. select; pick and choose; pick out, single out;
cull, glean, winnow; sift the chaff from the wheat, separate the chaff
from the wheat, winnow the chaff from the wheat; pick up, pitch upon;
pick one's way; indulge one's fancy. set apart, mark out for; mark &c.
550. prefer; have rather, have as lief; fancy &c. (desire) 865; be
persuaded &c. 615. take a decided step, take a decisive step; commit
oneself to a course; pass the Rubicon, cross the Rubicon; cast in one's
lot with; take for better or for worse. Adj. optional; discretional &c.
(voluntary) 600. eclectic; choosing &c. v.; preferential; chosen &c.
v.; choice &c. (good) 648. Adv. optionally &c. adj.; at pleasure &c.
(will) 600; either the one or the other; or at the option of; whether
or not; once and for all; for one's money. by choice, by preference; in
preference; rather, before.

#609a. Absence of Choice.—N. no choice, Hobson's choice; first come
#
first served, random selection; necessity &c. 601; not a pin to choose
&c.
(equality) 27; any, the first that comes; that or nothing.
neutrality, indifference; indecision &c. (irresolution) 605;
arbitrariness.
coercion (compulsion) 744.
V. be neutral &c. adj.; have no choice, have no election; waive,
not
vote; abstain from voting, refrain from voting; leave undecided; "make
a
virtue of necessity" [Two Gentlemen].
Adj. neutral, neuter; indifferent, uninterested; undecided &c.
(irresolute) 605.
Adv. either &c. (choice) 609.
Phr. who cares? what difference does it make? "There's not a
dime's
worth of difference between them." [George Wallace].

Explanation

This excerpt is taken from Roget’s Thesaurus (1852), the seminal reference work compiled by Peter Mark Roget, a British physician, lexicographer, and polymath. Unlike a traditional dictionary, Roget’s Thesaurus organizes words thematically under broad conceptual categories (e.g., "Caprice," "Choice," "Absence of Choice") rather than alphabetically. Each entry lists nouns (N.), verbs (V.), adjectives (Adj.), adverbs (Adv.), and phrases (Phr.) related to the central idea, along with cross-references to other entries (e.g., "c. adj." for "see adjective section").

The text you’ve provided consists of three closely related entries (#608, #609, #609a) that explore the spectrum of decision-making, volition, and arbitrariness. Below is a detailed breakdown of each, focusing on the textual mechanics, themes, literary devices, and significance of Roget’s method.

1. Entry #608: Caprice

Definition in Context: This entry catalogs words and phrases describing unpredictable, impulsive, or irrational behavior—actions or decisions made without logical consistency. The structure reveals Roget’s taxonomic approach to language, grouping synonyms hierarchically and etymologically.

Key Themes & Ideas:

Irrationality vs. Rationality: The entry contrasts with #609 (Choice), where decisions are deliberate. Here, actions are whimsical, arbitrary, or contradictory (e.g., "blow hot and cold," "strain at a gnat and swallow a camel").
Human Folly: Many terms (e.g., "maggot in the brain," "wild-goose chase") suggest mental eccentricity or obsession, framing caprice as a quirk of human psychology.
Social Disapproval: Words like "crotchety," "wayward," and "contrary" imply moral or social judgment—caprice is often seen as a flaw.

Literary & Stylistic Devices:

Etymological Range: Roget includes obsolete terms (marked "[obs3]"), French borrowings ("boutade," "tourner casaque"), and colloquialisms ("flimflam," "kinky [U.S.]"), showing how language evolves.
Biblical & Classical Allusions:
- "Strain at a gnat and swallow a camel" (Matthew 23:24) critiques hypocritical inconsistency.
- "Nil fuit unquam sic inipar sibi" (Latin: "Nothing was ever so unequal to itself") reinforces the theme of self-contradiction.
Metaphor & Idiom:
- "The deuce is in him" (a 19th-century idiom for unpredictable behavior).
- "Full of whims" personifies caprice as a tangible force.
Parallelism: The verbs ("play fast and loose," "play fantastic tricks") use repetition of "play" to emphasize performative, insincere behavior.

Significance:

Psychological Insight: Roget’s list reflects Victorian-era fascination with human irrationality, prefiguring Freud’s later theories of the unconscious.
Cultural Critique: The entry subtly mocking fickleness ("penny wise and pound foolish") aligns with 19th-century moralism about thrift and consistency.
Linguistic Play: The sheer variety of synonyms (from "whim" to "hysterical") demonstrates how language fragments to describe nuanced human behavior.

2. Entry #609: Choice

Definition in Context: This entry shifts to deliberate selection, contrasting with the arbitrariness of #608. It covers voluntary decision-making, preference, and commitment, with a focus on agency and consequence.

Key Themes & Ideas:

Autonomy & Power: Words like "discretion," "adoption," and "decision" emphasize personal or political agency (note the reference to "political election").
Process of Selection: The verbs trace a narrative of choice:
- Presentation ("offers one’s choice," "hold out the alternative").
- Deliberation ("use discretion," "make up one’s mind").
- Commitment ("embrace," "cast in one’s lot with," "pass the Rubicon").
Irreversibility: Phrases like "once and for all" and "cross the Rubicon" (a reference to Caesar’s fateful decision to march on Rome) suggest decisive, life-altering choices.

Literary & Stylistic Devices:

Historical & Literary Allusions:
- "Pass the Rubicon" (Suetonius’ Life of Caesar) evokes historical turning points.
- "Take for better or for worse" echoes marriage vows, framing choice as a binding contract.
Metaphor & Imagery:
- "Sift the chaff from the wheat" (separating valuable from worthless) is a biblical agricultural metaphor (Matthew 3:12).
- "Scissors and paste" humorously reduces selection to a mechanical act (foreshadowing modern "cut-and-paste" culture).
Contrast with #608: While #608 is chaotic, #609 is ordered—choices are "exercised," "settled," or "decided."

Significance:

Victorian Values: The entry reflects 19th-century ideals of rational decision-making, where choice is tied to moral responsibility (e.g., marriage, politics).
Existential Weight: The permanence of some choices ("cross the Rubicon") hints at fate and consequence, a theme later explored by existentialists like Sartre.
Democracy & Politics: The inclusion of "political election" ties personal choice to collective governance, a nod to Roget’s era of expanding suffrage.

3. Entry #609a: Absence of Choice

Definition in Context: This entry explores the lack of agency—situations where choice is denied, irrelevant, or illusory. It bridges #608 (caprice) and #609 (choice) by examining indifference, coercion, and necessity.

Key Themes & Ideas:

Illusion of Choice:
- "Hobson’s choice" (a free choice where only one option is offered) and "first come, first served" expose false agency.
- "Not a pin to choose" (no meaningful difference) suggests indifference or futility.
Coercion & Neutrality:
- Terms like "coercion" and "arbitrariness" imply external control, while "neutrality" and "indecision" suggest internal paralysis.
Fatalism: The phrase "make a virtue of necessity" (from Shakespeare’s Two Gentlemen of Verona) frames acceptance of inevitability as a moral act.

Literary & Stylistic Devices:

Cultural References:
- "Hobson’s choice" (from 17th-century Cambridge stable-keeper Thomas Hobson, who forced customers to take the horse nearest the door).
- The George Wallace quote ("There’s not a dime’s worth of difference") injects modern political cynicism into the 19th-century text.
Rhetorical Questions:
- "Who cares? What difference does it make?" mimics colloquial resignation, breaking the thesaurus’s usual neutrality.
Juxtaposition: The entry contrasts with #609 by showing choice’s absence or meaninglessness.

Significance:

Existential Dread: The entry grapples with lack of free will, a theme central to absurdism (Camus) and determinism.
Social Critique: References to coercion and indifference reflect power dynamics (e.g., political disenfranchisement).
Humorous Resignation: The tone shifts from Roget’s usual precision to sarcasm ("who cares?"), revealing how language adapts to express futility.

Overarching Analysis: Roget’s Method & Philosophical Implications

Taxonomy as Worldview:
- Roget’s hierarchical lists mirror Enlightenment-era classification (like Linnaeus’ biology), suggesting that language can order human experience.
- Yet, the overlap between entries (e.g., "arbitrary" appears in both #608 and #609a) shows that human behavior resists neat categories.
Language as a Mirror of Thought:
- The sheer volume of synonyms for caprice (#608) versus choice (#609) implies that irrationality is more linguistically diverse—perhaps because it’s harder to define.
- The inclusion of obsolete words ([obs3]) treats language as a living archive of cultural attitudes.
Victorian Anxieties:
- The entries reflect 19th-century tensions between:
  - Individualism (choice, discretion) vs. social conformity (caprice as deviance).
  - Progress (rational decision-making) vs. fatalism (absence of choice).
- The moral weight given to choice (#609) aligns with Protestant work ethic and utilitarianism.
Modern Relevance:
- Decision Fatigue: The "embarras de choix" (paralysis from too many options) anticipates modern consumer culture.
- Algorithmic Choice: Today’s "random selection" (#609a) resonates with AI-driven recommendations, where "choice" is often illusory.
- Political Polarization: The George Wallace quote feels prescient in an era of false equivalencies ("both sides are the same").

Conclusion: Why This Excerpt Matters

Roget’s Thesaurus is often seen as a dry reference tool, but this excerpt reveals it as a cultural artifact that:

Maps the boundaries of human agency (from caprice to coercion).
Preserves historical attitudes toward rationality, morality, and free will.
Demonstrates how language shapes thought—by offering synonyms, Roget frames how we perceive decision-making.

The juxtaposition of these three entries (#608, #609, #609a) creates a spectrum of human behavior:

Caprice = Chaos
Choice = Order
Absence of Choice = Void

In this way, Roget doesn’t just list words—he constructs a philosophy of action, one that remains strikingly relevant in debates about free will, algorithms, and the illusions of modernity.

Questions

Question 1

The progression from entry #608 (Caprice) to #609 (Choice) to #609a (Absence of Choice) most closely mirrors which of the following conceptual frameworks?

A. The Freudian model of id, ego, and superego, where impulsive desires are mediated by rational control and ultimately suppressed by moral strictures.
B. The Aristotelian virtues of temperance, courage, and wisdom, where excess is balanced by moderation and deficiency by restraint.
C. The Hegelian dialectic of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis, where contradictory forces resolve into a higher unity.
D. The existentialist spectrum of absurdity, authenticity, and alienation, where arbitrary action confronts deliberate commitment before yielding to nihilistic indifference.
E. The Kantian categorical imperative, where caprice represents hypothetical imperatives, choice embodies practical reason, and absence of choice signifies moral law.

Question 2

The phrase "strain at a gnat and swallow a camel" (#608) functions in the passage primarily as:

A. an example of hyperbole to emphasize the grotesque scale of human inconsistency.
B. a biblical allusion that critiques hypocritical moral prioritization under the guise of caprice.
C. a metaphor for the cognitive dissonance inherent in arbitrary decision-making.
D. an ironic juxtaposition of trivial and monumental actions to underscore the illogical nature of whimsical behavior.
E. a satirical indictment of religious dogma’s role in exacerbating irrational choices.

Question 3

The inclusion of "Hobson’s choice" and "first come, first served" in #609a (Absence of Choice) serves to:

A. illustrate how economic scarcity historically constrained individual agency.
B. demonstrate the linguistic evolution of phrases describing false or limited autonomy.
C. highlight the arbitrary social conventions that masquerade as equitable systems.
D. expose the performative nature of "choice" in contexts where options are either illusory or predetermined.
E. contrast voluntary selection (#609) with coercive selection (#609a) through historical examples.

Question 4

Which of the following best describes the tonal shift between the phrases "cross the Rubicon" (#609) and "make a virtue of necessity" (#609a)?

A. From heroic resolve to pragmatic resignation.
B. From political ambition to philosophical stoicism.
C. From irreversible commitment to reluctant acceptance.
D. From deliberate agency to ironic compliance.
E. From existential risk-taking to fatalistic detachment.

Question 5

The structural organization of Roget’s entries—grouping nouns, verbs, adjectives, and phrases under conceptual headings—most fundamentally reflects which of the following assumptions about language?

A. That lexical categories are hierarchically ordered according to their grammatical function.
B. That human thought is inherently taxonomic, seeking to impose order on chaotic experience.
C. That synonymy is a stable and objective relationship between words with identical denotations.
D. That the breadth of a concept can be fully captured by enumerating its linguistic associations.
E. That language operates as a dynamic system where meaning arises from the interplay of contrast and similarity.

Solutions and Explanations

1) Correct answer: D

Why D is most correct: The existentialist spectrum—where absurdity (caprice as arbitrary, meaningless action), authenticity (choice as deliberate, committed agency), and alienation (absence of choice as nihilistic indifference or coercion) align most closely with Roget’s progression. Existentialism, particularly in Sartre and Camus, grapples with the tension between radical freedom (#609) and the absurdity of existence (#608), often culminating in resignation or indifference (#609a). The passage’s focus on human agency, its contradictions, and its erosion mirrors this framework more precisely than the other options.