Article #391-1 | Gutenberg Articles

Excerpt

Excerpt from The Song of Roland, by Unknown Author

LXXVIII
From the other part, Chemubles of Muneigre.
Right to the ground his hair swept either way;
He for a jest would bear a heavier weight
Than four yoked mules, beneath their load that strain.
That land he had, God's curse on it was plain.
No sun shone there, nor grew there any grain,
No dew fell there, nor any shower of rain,
The very stones were black upon that plain;
And many say that devils there remain.
Says Chemubles "My sword is in its place,
At Rencesvals scarlat I will it stain;
Find I Rollanz the proud upon my way,
I'll fall on him, or trust me not again,
And Durendal I'll conquer with this blade,
Franks shall be slain, and France a desert made."
The dozen peers are, at this word, away,
Five score thousand of Sarrazins they take;
Who keenly press, and on to battle haste;
In a fir-wood their gear they ready make.

LXXIX

Ready they make hauberks Sarrazinese,
That folded are, the greater part, in three;
And they lace on good helms Sarragucese;
Gird on their swords of tried steel Viennese;
Fine shields they have, and spears Valentinese,
And white, blue, red, their ensigns take the breeze,
They've left their mules behind, and their palfreys,
Their chargers mount, and canter knee by knee.
Fair shines the sun, the day is bright and clear,
Light bums again from all their polished gear.
A thousand horns they sound, more proud to seem;
Great is the noise, the Franks its echo hear.
Says Oliver: "Companion, I believe,
Sarrazins now in battle must we meet."
Answers Rollanz: "God grant us then the fee!
For our King's sake well must we quit us here;
Man for his lord should suffer great disease,
Most bitter cold endure, and burning heat,
His hair and skin should offer up at need.
Now must we each lay on most hardily,
So evil songs neer sung of us shall be.
Pagans are wrong: Christians are right indeed.
Evil example will never come of me."
AOI.

Explanation

**Detailed Explanation of The Song of Roland (Excerpt: Laisse LXXVIII–LXXIX)**

Context of The Song of Roland

The Song of Roland (La Chanson de Roland) is an 11th-century Old French epic poem (chanson de geste) and one of the oldest surviving works of French literature. It recounts the Battle of Roncevaux Pass (778 AD), where Charlemagne’s rear guard, led by his nephew Roland, was ambushed by Saracen (Muslim) forces. The poem blends historical events with legendary embellishments, emphasizing Christian heroism, feudal loyalty, and the clash between Christianity and Islam.

This excerpt occurs just before the climactic battle at Roncevaux (Rencesvals). The Saracen forces, led by figures like Chemubles of Muneigre, prepare to attack Roland’s Franks, while Roland and his companion Oliver steel themselves for combat.

Line-by-Line Analysis & Literary Breakdown

Laisse LXXVIII: The Saracen Threat (Chemubles’ Boast & the Cursed Land)

"From the other part, Chemubles of Muneigre. Right to the ground his hair swept either way; He for a jest would bear a heavier weight Than four yoked mules, beneath their load that strain."

Introduction of Chemubles: A Saracen warrior, introduced with hyperbolic strength (carrying more than four mules). His long hair (sweeping the ground) suggests wildness, a common trope for "barbaric" non-Christian foes in medieval literature.
Physical Exaggeration: His superhuman strength reinforces the epic’s larger-than-life tone, where warriors are defined by extraordinary feats.

"That land he had, God's curse on it was plain. No sun shone there, nor grew there any grain, No dew fell there, nor any shower of rain, The very stones were black upon that plain; And many say that devils there remain."

Symbolic Landscape: Chemubles’ homeland is cursed and infertile, a stark contrast to the divinely favored Christian lands. The absence of sun, rain, and life mirrors medieval Christian views of Muslim territories as godless and damned.
- Black stones & devils: Reinforce the demonic association with Saracens, a common medieval trope. The land’s barrenness symbolizes spiritual corruption.
- Literary Device: Pathetic fallacy (nature reflecting moral state) and foreshadowing (the coming battle’s darkness).

"Says Chemubles 'My sword is in its place, At Rencesvals scarlat I will it stain; Find I Rollanz the proud upon my way, I'll fall on him, or trust me not again, And Durendal I'll conquer with this blade, Franks shall be slain, and France a desert made.'"

Boastful Challenge: Chemubles vows to stain his sword with Roland’s blood and seize Durendal (Roland’s legendary sword). His threat to turn France into a "desert" mirrors the apocalyptic stakes of the battle—Christianity vs. Islam, civilization vs. chaos.
- "Scarlat" (scarlet): Blood imagery, emphasizing violence.
- "Durendal": A symbol of Roland’s heroism; the Saracen’s desire to claim it represents their challenge to Christian dominance.
- Literary Device: Direct speech (Chemubles’ boast) heightens tension and foreshadows the coming clash.

"The dozen peers are, at this word, away, Five score thousand of Sarrazins they take; Who keenly press, and on to battle haste; In a fir-wood their gear they ready make."

Numerical Exaggeration: "Five score thousand" (100,000) Saracens vs. Roland’s twelve peers (elite warriors) underscores the heroic odds—a classic epic trope (e.g., The Iliad).
Setting: The fir-wood where they prepare is a liminal space, neither fully natural nor civilized, fitting for a decisive, almost mythic battle.

Laisse LXXIX: Arming for Battle & Christian Resolve

"Ready they make hauberks Sarrazinese, That folded are, the greater part, in three; And they lace on good helms Sarragucese; Gird on their swords of tried steel Viennese; Fine shields they have, and spears Valentinese, And white, blue, red, their ensigns take the breeze,"

Exotic Armor: The Saracens’ gear is foreign and elaborate ("hauberks folded in three," "helms Sarragucese"), emphasizing their otherness.
- Geographical References: "Viennese" (Vienna), "Valentinese" (Valencia) suggest a pan-Islamic coalition against Christendom.
- Colorful Banners: The vibrant flags ("white, blue, red") contrast with the earlier black stones, highlighting the Saracens’ superficial splendor vs. their moral corruption.

"They've left their mules behind, and their palfreys, Their chargers mount, and canter knee by knee. Fair shines the sun, the day is bright and clear, Light burns again from all their polished gear."

Martial Pageantry: The Saracens abandon slow beasts (mules, palfreys) for warhorses (chargers), signaling the shift to battle.
- "Light burns from polished gear": A visual spectacle, but also ironic—their gleaming armor will soon be bloodied.
- Weather Contrast: The bright sun contrasts with the earlier cursed land, suggesting the Saracens’ temporary triumph before their inevitable defeat (a common epic structure).

"A thousand horns they sound, more proud to seem; Great is the noise, the Franks its echo hear."

Auditory Imagery: The blaring horns create a sensory overload, emphasizing the Saracens’ arrogance ("proud to seem").
- "Franks its echo hear": The sound reaches the Christians, building suspense before the clash.

"Says Oliver: 'Companion, I believe, Sarrazins now in battle must we meet.' Answers Rollanz: 'God grant us then the fee! For our King's sake well must we quit us here;"

Oliver’s Realism vs. Roland’s Idealism:
- Oliver states the obvious (battle is coming), showing pragmatism.
- Roland responds with feudal piety: "God grant us then the fee!" ("fee" = reward, but also duty). His focus is on honor and loyalty to Charlemagne.

"Man for his lord should suffer great disease, Most bitter cold endure, and burning heat, His hair and skin should offer up at need. Now must we each lay on most hardily, So evil songs neer sung of us shall be."

Feudal Code: Roland articulates the medieval warrior ethos:
- A vassal must endure hardship ("disease," "cold," "heat") for his lord.
- "Offer up his hair and skin": Extreme loyalty, even to the point of self-sacrifice.
- "Evil songs neer sung of us": Fear of shame in legend—epic heroes live for posterity’s judgment.

"Pagans are wrong: Christians are right indeed. Evil example will never come of me.'AOI."

Moral Certainty: Roland’s black-and-white worldview:
- "Pagans are wrong": Theocratic justification for war—Christianity is divinely ordained.
- "Evil example will never come of me": Roland’s unwavering virtue—he will die heroically, setting a moral example.
"AOI": A refrain in the poem, possibly meaning "This is the truth" or a musical cue for performance.

Key Themes in the Excerpt

Christian vs. Pagan (Good vs. Evil):
- The Saracens are demonized (cursed land, devils), while the Franks are divinely justified.
- Roland’s speech reinforces medieval Crusader ideology.
Feudal Loyalty & Heroic Sacrifice:
- Roland’s willingness to die for Charlemagne exemplifies the vassal-lord bond.
- The fear of shame ("evil songs") drives heroic action.
Epic Conventions:
- Superhuman warriors (Chemubles’ strength).
- Numerical exaggeration (100,000 Saracens).
- Foreshadowing (Chemubles’ boast, Oliver’s warning).
Nature as Moral Reflection:
- The barren, cursed land of the Saracens vs. the bright sun before battle.
Performance & Oral Tradition:
- The repetitive structure (e.g., listing armor) and "AOI" suggest the poem was meant to be recited.

Significance of the Passage

Propaganda for the Crusades: The poem justifies holy war by portraying Muslims as demonic invaders.
Feudal Propaganda: Reinforces the duty of vassals to die for their lords, strengthening the medieval social order.
Literary Influence: Established tropes for later epics (e.g., The Divine Comedy’s demonized Muslims, El Cantar de Mio Cid).
Cultural Identity: The Franks’ victory (despite odds) affirms Christian European superiority in the medieval imagination.

Conclusion

This excerpt captures the clash of civilizations at the heart of The Song of Roland. Through vivid imagery, moral absolutism, and epic grandeur, it sets the stage for Roland’s heroic last stand—a battle that is as much about faith and loyalty as it is about physical combat. The Saracens’ superficial splendor contrasts with the Franks’ moral righteousness, ensuring that, in the poem’s worldview, Christianity will prevail.

Would you like further analysis on any specific aspect (e.g., historical context, comparisons to other epics)?

Questions

Question 1

The description of Chemubles’ homeland ("No sun shone there, nor grew there any grain, / No dew fell there, nor any shower of rain, / The very stones were black upon that plain") serves primarily to:

A. establish the Saracens’ technological inferiority through their inability to cultivate arable land.
B. contrast the Saracens’ ascetic discipline with the Franks’ indulgent materialism.
C. encode a medieval Christian cosmology wherein moral corruption manifests in physical desolation.
D. foreshadow the Saracens’ tactical advantage in using the barren terrain for ambush.
E. critique the Franks’ environmental exploitation by implying their land’s fertility depends on stolen resources.

Question 2

Roland’s assertion that "Pagans are wrong: Christians are right indeed" is most effectively read as:

A. a moment of dramatic irony, given the poem’s later revelation of Roland’s own moral failings.
B. an anachronistic interpolation by a later scribe, reflecting post-Crusade theological debates.
C. a psychological defense mechanism to suppress his fear of impending annihilation.
D. a literal historical account of 8th-century Carolingian religious doctrine.
E. a performative reinforcement of the poem’s ideological function as Crusade propaganda.

Question 3

The structural juxtaposition of Chemubles’ boast ("Franks shall be slain, and France a desert made") with Roland’s response ("Evil example will never come of me") primarily serves to:

A. underscore the Saracens’ superior oratory skills as a counterpoint to Frankish brutality.
B. frame the conflict as a clash between apocalyptic nihilism and exemplary martyrdom.
C. expose Roland’s naiveté in underestimating the Saracens’ military strategy.
D. highlight the economic motivations behind the Crusades through land-imagery.
E. parody the epic genre by reducing complex geopolitics to binary moral posturing.

Question 4

The passage’s repeated cataloging of Saracen armor ("hauberks Sarrazinese," "helms Sarragucese," "swords of tried steel Viennese") functions most significantly to:

A. create a sensory overload that mirrors the Franks’ perceptual disorientation before battle.
B. subvert the epic tradition by emphasizing materialism over spiritual virtue.
C. demonstrate the Saracens’ cultural sophistication as a foil to Frankish rusticity.
D. imply the Saracens’ reliance on stolen Christian technology.
E. satirize the vanity of warfare through grotesque sartorial excess.

Question 5

Oliver’s line ("Companion, I believe, / Sarrazins now in battle must we meet") followed by Roland’s reply ("God grant us then the fee!") reveals a tension between:

A. skepticism and blind faith, with Oliver as the voice of reason.
B. aristocratic privilege and peasant conscription, encoded in their divergent dialects.
C. chivalric romance and historical chronicle, as the poem blends genres.
D. pragmatic assessment and ideological transcendence as complementary warrior virtues.
E. generational conflict, with Oliver representing youthful caution and Roland aged dogmatism.

Solutions and Explanations

1) Correct answer: C

Why C is most correct: The passage’s description of Chemubles’ homeland is steeped in pathetic fallacy, where the physical environment reflects moral and spiritual states. The barrenness ("no sun," "no grain," "black stones") aligns with medieval Christian associations of Islamic lands as godless and accursed—a trope reinforcing the moral geography of the poem. This encoding of cosmology (divine favor = fertility; damnation = desolation) is central to the text’s theological worldview and its function as Crusade propaganda.