Gutenberg Articles

Appearance

Excerpt ​

Excerpt from Rasselas, Prince of Abyssinia, by Samuel Johnson

This hint rekindled the Prince’s desire of passing the mountains. Having
seen what the mechanist had already performed, he was willing to fancy
that he could do more, yet resolved to inquire further before he suffered
hope to afflict him by disappointment. “I am afraid,” said he to the
artist, “that your imagination prevails over your skill, and that you now
tell me rather what you wish than what you know. Every animal has his
element assigned him; the birds have the air, and man and beasts the
earth.” “So,” replied the mechanist, “fishes have the water, in which
yet beasts can swim by nature and man by art. He that can swim needs not
despair to fly; to swim is to fly in a grosser fluid, and to fly is to
swim in a subtler. We are only to proportion our power of resistance to
the different density of matter through which we are to pass. You will
be necessarily up-borne by the air if you can renew any impulse upon it
faster than the air can recede from the pressure.”

“But the exercise of swimming,” said the Prince, “is very laborious; the
strongest limbs are soon wearied. I am afraid the act of flying will be
yet more violent; and wings will be of no great use unless we can fly
further than we can swim.”

“The labour of rising from the ground,” said the artist, “will be great,
as we see it in the heavier domestic fowls; but as we mount higher the
earth’s attraction and the body’s gravity will be gradually diminished,
till we shall arrive at a region where the man shall float in the air
without any tendency to fall; no care will then be necessary but to move
forward, which the gentlest impulse will effect. You, sir, whose
curiosity is so extensive, will easily conceive with what pleasure a
philosopher, furnished with wings and hovering in the sky, would see the
earth and all its inhabitants rolling beneath him, and presenting to him
successively, by its diurnal motion, all the countries within the same
parallel. How must it amuse the pendent spectator to see the moving
scene of land and ocean, cities and deserts; to survey with equal
security the marts of trade and the fields of battle; mountains infested
by barbarians, and fruitful regions gladdened by plenty and lulled by
peace. How easily shall we then trace the Nile through all his passages,
pass over to distant regions, and examine the face of nature from one
extremity of the earth to the other.”

Explanation ​

Detailed Explanation of the Excerpt from Rasselas, Prince of Abyssinia by Samuel Johnson ​

1. Context of the Excerpt ​

Rasselas, Prince of Abyssinia (1759) is a philosophical tale by Samuel Johnson, written in the tradition of the conte philosophique (philosophical fiction). The story follows Prince Rasselas and his companions as they escape the confines of the "Happy Valley" (a paradise-like but stifling utopia) to explore the world in search of true happiness. Along the way, they encounter various figures who embody different philosophical perspectives on human existence.

This excerpt comes from Chapter 22, where the group meets a mechanist (an inventor or engineer) who claims to have devised a method for human flight. The Prince, skeptical but intrigued, engages in a debate about the feasibility of such an invention. The dialogue reflects broader Enlightenment themes: the limits of human ambition, the tension between imagination and reason, and the pursuit of knowledge as a means to transcend natural constraints.

2. Themes in the Excerpt ​

A. Human Ambition vs. Natural Limits ​

The mechanist represents human ingenuity and the Enlightenment faith in progress, arguing that flight is merely an extension of swimming—both involve mastering resistance against a fluid medium (water or air). His optimism contrasts with the Prince’s skepticism, which reflects the fear of overreaching human limits (a common theme in Johnson’s work, influenced by his Christian humanism).

  • The mechanist’s claim that "to swim is to fly in a grosser fluid, and to fly is to swim in a subtler" suggests that technology can overcome natural barriers.
  • The Prince counters with practical concerns: "the exercise of swimming is very laborious"—implying that even if flight is possible, the effort may outweigh the benefit.

This tension mirrors the Enlightenment debate between empirical science (Bacon, Newton) and philosophical caution (Pascal, Rousseau). Johnson, while admiring reason, often warns against hubris—the mechanist’s vision is grand but may be impractical.

B. The Illusion of Perfect Freedom ​

The mechanist’s description of flight is utopian: he imagines a philosopher soaring above the earth, observing all of human life "with equal security"—free from the constraints of geography, politics, or labor. This fantasy reflects the Enlightenment ideal of the "view from nowhere"—a detached, godlike perspective that promises omniscience and liberation.

However, Johnson subtly undermines this vision:

  • The mechanist’s language is speculative ("you will easily conceive"), not empirical.
  • The Prince’s objection—"wings will be of no great use unless we can fly further than we can swim"—hints that even flight would not grant true freedom, as physical exhaustion and practical limits remain.

This aligns with Rasselas’ central question: Can humans ever achieve perfect happiness, or are we doomed to cycle between desire and disappointment?

C. The Philosopher’s Detachment vs. Human Engagement ​

The mechanist’s fantasy of a flying philosopher is ironically detached:

"How must it amuse the pendent spectator to see the moving scene of land and ocean, cities and deserts..."

The word "amuse" is key—it suggests passive observation, not active participation. Johnson, who valued moral and social engagement, may be critiquing the Enlightenment’s overemphasis on abstract reason at the expense of lived experience. The mechanist’s vision is coldly intellectual, lacking the struggles and joys of real human life.

3. Literary Devices & Stylistic Analysis ​

A. Dialogue as Debate ​

Johnson structures the passage as a Socratic dialogue, where the mechanist and Prince represent opposing viewpoints:

  • Mechanist: Optimistic, speculative, rhetorical ("You will be necessarily up-borne by the air...").
  • Prince: Pragmatic, skeptical, probing ("But the exercise of swimming is very laborious...").

This form allows Johnson to explore ideas without endorsing them, a hallmark of his philosophical style.

B. Analogical Reasoning ​

The mechanist’s argument relies on analogy:

  • Swimming → Flying: Both involve resisting a fluid medium (water/air).
  • Birds → Humans: If birds fly by nature, humans can by art ("man by art").

This reflects Enlightenment scientific reasoning (e.g., Newtonian physics), but the Prince’s objections expose its limits—analogies can be misleading if pushed too far.

C. Imagery of Flight and Vision ​

The mechanist’s description of flight is grand and poetic:

"the earth and all its inhabitants rolling beneath him... the moving scene of land and ocean, cities and deserts..."

  • "Rolling beneath him" → Suggests divine or godlike perspective (like Milton’s Satan surveying Earth in Paradise Lost).
  • "Moving scene" → Evokes theater or spectacle, reinforcing the idea of detached observation.

This imagery contrasts with the grounded, laborious reality the Prince emphasizes, creating a tension between ideal and reality.

D. Irony and Foreshadowing ​

Johnson’s tone is subtly ironic:

  • The mechanist’s claims are theoretically plausible but practically dubious (a common Johnsonian critique of utopian schemes).
  • The Prince’s skepticism foreshadows the novel’s conclusion: that no single pursuit (knowledge, pleasure, power) can satisfy human desires.

The passage thus undermines its own fantasy, aligning with Johnson’s view that human happiness is found in moderation, not in extreme ambitions.

4. Significance of the Excerpt ​

A. Enlightenment Optimism vs. Johnson’s Skepticism ​

The mechanist embodies the Enlightenment belief in progress—that science and reason can conquer nature. However, Johnson (a devout Christian and moralist) questions whether such conquests lead to true fulfillment. The Prince’s skepticism reflects Johnson’s own distrust of unchecked ambition.

B. The Limits of Human Knowledge ​

The passage explores whether knowledge alone can liberate humans. The mechanist’s flying philosopher is all-seeing but uninvolved—a critique of pure intellectualism without moral or emotional engagement. Johnson suggests that wisdom requires more than observation; it demands participation in human life.

C. The Search for Happiness ​

In Rasselas, every character seeks happiness through different means (wealth, love, knowledge, power), only to find disappointment. The mechanist’s flight is another false promise—even if achieved, it would not resolve the human condition of restlessness. Johnson’s message is that happiness is not found in escaping limits but in accepting and navigating them.

5. Conclusion: Why This Passage Matters ​

This excerpt is a microcosm of Rasselas’ central concerns:

  • The tension between imagination and reality (can we achieve what we dream?).
  • The limits of human ambition (is progress always beneficial?).
  • The search for meaning (does knowledge alone bring happiness?).

Johnson does not outright dismiss the mechanist’s ideas but exposes their fragility. The Prince’s cautious realism serves as a counterbalance to the mechanist’s utopianism, embodying Johnson’s humanistic skepticism—a belief that while reason and invention are valuable, they must be tempered by humility and moral wisdom.

In the end, the passage is less about whether humans can fly and more about whether we should want to—and what we might lose in the pursuit.