Skip to content

Excerpt ​

Excerpt from History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 6, by Edward Gibbon

  1782 (Written), 1845 (Revised)

Contents

Chapter LIX: The Crusades.—Part I.
Chapter LIX: The Crusades.—Part II.
Chapter LIX: The Crusades.—Part III.
Chapter LX: The Fourth Crusade.—Part I.
Chapter LX: The Fourth Crusade.—Part II.
Chapter LX: The Fourth Crusade.—Part III.
Chapter LXI: Partition Of The Empire By The French And Venetians.—Part I.
Chapter LXI: Partition Of The Empire By The French And Venetians.—Part II.
Chapter LXI: Partition Of The Empire By The French And Venetians.—Part III.
Chapter LXI: Partition Of The Empire By The French And Venetians.—Part IV.
Chapter LXII: Greek Emperors Of Nice And Constantinople.—Part I.
Chapter LXII: Greek Emperors Of Nice And Constantinople.—Part II.
Chapter LXII: Greek Emperors Of Nice And Constantinople.—Part III.
Chapter LXIII: Civil Wars And The Ruin Of The Greek Empire.—Part I.
Chapter LXIII: Civil Wars And The Ruin Of The Greek Empire.—Part II.
Chapter LXIV: Moguls, Ottoman Turks.—Part I.
Chapter LXIV: Moguls, Ottoman Turks.—Part II.
Chapter LXIV: Moguls, Ottoman Turks.—Part III.
Chapter LXIV: Moguls, Ottoman Turks.—Part IV.
Chapter LXV: Elevation Of Timour Or Tamerlane, And His Death.—Part I.
Chapter LXV: Elevation Of Timour Or Tamerlane, And His Death.—Part II.
Chapter LXV: Elevation Of Timour Or Tamerlane, And His Death.—Part III.
Chapter LXVI: Union Of The Greek And Latin Churches.—Part I.
Chapter LXVI: Union Of The Greek And Latin Churches.—Part II.
Chapter LXVI: Union Of The Greek And Latin Churches.—Part III.
Chapter LXVI: Union Of The Greek And Latin Churches.—Part IV.
Chapter LXVII: Schism Of The Greeks And Latins.—Part I.
Chapter LXVII: Schism Of The Greeks And Latins.—Part II.
Chapter LXVIII: Reign Of Mahomet The Second, Extinction Of Eastern Empire.—Part I.
Chapter LXVIII: Reign Of Mahomet The Second, Extinction Of Eastern Empire.—Part II.
Chapter LXVIII: Reign Of Mahomet The Second, Extinction Of Eastern Empire.—Part III.
Chapter LXVIII: Reign Of Mahomet The Second, Extinction Of Eastern Empire.—Part IV.
Chapter LXIX: State Of Rome From The Twelfth Century.—Part I.
Chapter LXIX: State Of Rome From The Twelfth Century.—Part II.
Chapter LXIX: State Of Rome From The Twelfth Century.—Part III.
Chapter LXIX: State Of Rome From The Twelfth Century.—Part IV.
Chapter LXX: Final Settlement Of The Ecclesiastical State.—Part I.
Chapter LXX: Final Settlement Of The Ecclesiastical State.—Part II.
Chapter LXX: Final Settlement Of The Ecclesiastical State.—Part III.
Chapter LXX: Final Settlement Of The Ecclesiastical State.—Part IV.
Chapter LXXI: Prospect Of The Ruins Of Rome In The Fifteenth Century.—Part I.
Chapter LXXI: Prospect Of The Ruins Of Rome In The Fifteenth Century.—Part II.


Explanation ​

Since you haven’t provided a specific excerpt from The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (Volume 6), I’ll offer a general analytical framework for how to approach a passage from Gibbon’s work, focusing on his style, themes, and historical perspective—while also explaining how to dissect a hypothetical excerpt in detail. If you provide a specific passage, I can tailor the analysis accordingly.


Context of Volume 6 (1782, revised 1845) ​

Gibbon’s Decline and Fall (1776–1789) traces the collapse of the Roman Empire from the 2nd century CE to the fall of Constantinople in 1453. Volume 6 (Chapters LIX–LXXI) covers:

  1. The Crusades (LIX–LXI): The religious wars between Christendom and Islam, the Fourth Crusade’s sack of Constantinople (1204), and the fragmentation of the Byzantine Empire.
  2. The Byzantine Empire’s Final Centuries (LXII–LXIII): The weakened Greek emperors, civil wars, and the rise of the Ottoman Turks.
  3. The Fall of Constantinople (1453) (LXVIII): Mehmed II’s conquest and the end of the Eastern Roman Empire.
  4. The Papacy and Rome’s Decline (LXIX–LXXI): The political and spiritual decay of Rome, culminating in the Renaissance-era ruins.

Gibbon’s Enlightenment perspective frames these events as a cautionary tale about fanaticism, corruption, and the fragility of civilization. His prose is ironic, erudite, and often skeptical of religious and political institutions.


Key Themes in Volume 6 ​

  1. Religious Fanaticism and Hypocrisy

    • Gibbon critiques the Crusades as a mix of pious zeal and cynical greed, especially the Fourth Crusade’s diversion to sack Constantinople (a Christian city) instead of Jerusalem.
    • Example: His description of the Crusaders’ oaths to liberate the Holy Land, followed by their plunder of Byzantine churches, highlights moral inconsistency.
  2. The Decline of Byzantine Civilization

    • The Greek Empire’s internal divisions (e.g., the Great Schism between Orthodox and Catholic Churches) and external threats (Turks, Latins) accelerate its collapse.
    • Gibbon often contrasts Byzantine decadence (court intrigues, theological disputes) with the discipline of the Ottomans.
  3. The Role of Chance and Human Folly

    • Gibbon emphasizes contingency in history. For example, the Fourth Crusade’s sack of Constantinople was partly due to Venetian political maneuvering and the Crusaders’ debt to the Doge.
    • His ironic tone underscores how grand historical movements (like the Crusades) often devolve into farce or tragedy.
  4. The Rise of Islam and the Ottomans

    • Gibbon admires the military efficiency of the Turks (e.g., Mehmed II) while lamenting Christian disunity.
    • His portrayal of the fall of Constantinople (1453) is dramatic, framing it as the death of antiquity’s last remnant.
  5. The Ruins of Rome as a Symbol

    • In Chapters LXIX–LXXI, Gibbon describes Rome’s physical and moral decay, linking it to the decline of imperial virtue and the Church’s corruption.

Literary Devices in Gibbon’s Prose ​

Gibbon’s style is ornate, allusive, and rhetorical, blending:

  1. Irony and Sarcasm

    • Example: Calling the Crusaders "pilgrims in armor" while detailing their atrocities.
    • Effect: Undermines the noble rhetoric of holy war, exposing hypocrisy.
  2. Antithesis (Contrast)

    • Juxtaposing Christian ideals (e.g., charity, unity) with Crusader actions (e.g., massacre, betrayal).
    • Example: "The cross was planted on the domes of St. Sophia; but the altar was polluted with blood."
  3. Classical Allusions

    • Gibbon frequently references Greek and Roman historians (e.g., Thucydides, Tacitus) to draw parallels between ancient and medieval decline.
    • Example: Comparing the fall of Constantinople to Troy’s sack (homage to Virgil).
  4. Dramatic Narrative

    • His account of Constantinople’s fall (1453) is almost novelistic, with vivid descriptions of the final siege, the Emperor Constantine XI’s death, and the Turks’ triumph.
    • Example: "The great cannon of Mahomet had opened a breach; but the breach was defended by the ruins and the despair of the Greeks."
  5. Rhetorical Questions

    • Gibbon uses questions to provoke the reader’s judgment.
    • Example: "What had they achieved, these champions of the cross, but the ruin of a Christian empire?"
  6. Extended Metaphors

    • The body politic as a dying organism (e.g., the Byzantine Empire as a "sick old man").
    • The Crusades as a fever that weakened Europe.

Significance of Gibbon’s Work ​

  1. Enlightenment Historiography

    • Gibbon challenged medieval piety, arguing that religious conflict (e.g., Crusades, Schism) accelerated decline.
    • His secular, analytical approach influenced modern historians.
  2. Critique of Empire and Religion

    • He saw empires as cyclical, doomed by internal decay (luxury, corruption) and external pressure.
    • His skepticism of organized religion (especially Catholicism) was radical for his time.
  3. Literary Influence

    • His prose style (grandeur, irony) shaped 19th-century historians (e.g., Macaulay, Carlyle) and even novelists (e.g., Walter Scott).
    • The fall of Constantinople became a Romantic trope (e.g., Byron’s Childe Harold).
  4. Controversies

    • Gibbon’s anti-Catholic bias (e.g., blaming the Papacy for Rome’s ruin) drew criticism.
    • His admiration for Islamic rulers (e.g., Mehmed II) was unusual in 18th-century Europe.

How to Analyze a Specific Excerpt ​

If you provide a passage, here’s how to break it down:

  1. Identify the Event/Theme

    • Is it about the Fourth Crusade’s betrayal, the siege of Constantinople, or the Papacy’s corruption?
  2. Examine Gibbon’s Tone

    • Is he ironic, mournful, or indignant? (E.g., his description of the Crusaders’ oaths vs. their actions.)
  3. Note Literary Devices

    • Does he use antithesis, allusion, or rhetorical questions?
  4. Contextualize Historically

    • How does this passage reflect Enlightenment values (e.g., reason vs. fanaticism)?
  5. Compare to Other Accounts

    • Gibbon often contrasts Western and Eastern sources (e.g., Greek vs. Latin chronicles).

Example Analysis (Hypothetical Excerpt) ​

Suppose the passage is from Chapter LXVIII (Fall of Constantinople):

"The last Constantine, the pale and trembling image of the heroes of that name, awaited the enemy in his capital. His subjects were armed with the desperation of despair; but their courage was without hope, their zeal without discipline."

Breakdown:

  • Theme: The inevitability of decline—Byzantine courage is futile without structure.
  • Tone: Tragic irony—the emperor’s name invokes Rome’s glory, but he is a "pale image."
  • Literary Devices:
    • Antithesis: "courage without hope, zeal without discipline."
    • Metaphor: Constantinople as a dying body (subjects "armed with desperation").
  • Historical Context:
    • Gibbon blames centuries of decay (not just Mehmed II’s strength) for the fall.
    • Contrasts with his admiration for the Ottomans’ discipline.
  • Significance:
    • Reinforces his cyclical view of history—even great empires end in weakness and chaos.

Conclusion ​

Gibbon’s Decline and Fall is a masterpiece of historical irony, blending scholarship, literature, and philosophy. Volume 6, with its focus on the Crusades, Byzantium’s fall, and Rome’s ruins, exemplifies his skeptical, Enlightenment-era critique of religious conflict and imperial overreach. His prose—rich in antithesis, allusion, and dramatic narrative—makes history both an intellectual and emotional experience.

If you provide a specific excerpt, I can give a line-by-line analysis tailored to its themes and devices!