Skip to content

Excerpt

Excerpt from Round the Red Lamp: Being Facts and Fancies of Medical Life, by Arthur Conan Doyle

But it was little chat that they had upon their homeward path. Smith's
mind was too full of the incidents of the evening, the absence of the
mummy from his neighbour's rooms, the step that passed him on the
stair, the reappearance--the extraordinary, inexplicable reappearance
of the grisly thing--and then this attack upon Lee, corresponding so
closely to the previous outrage upon another man against whom
Bellingham bore a grudge. All this settled in his thoughts, together
with the many little incidents which had previously turned him against
his neighbour, and the singular circumstances under which he was first
called in to him. What had been a dim suspicion, a vague, fantastic
conjecture, had suddenly taken form, and stood out in his mind as a
grim fact, a thing not to be denied. And yet, how monstrous it was!
how unheard of! how entirely beyond all bounds of human experience. An
impartial judge, or even the friend who walked by his side, would
simply tell him that his eyes had deceived him, that the mummy had been
there all the time, that young Lee had tumbled into the river as any
other man tumbles into a river, and that a blue pill was the best thing
for a disordered liver. He felt that he would have said as much if the
positions had been reversed. And yet he could swear that Bellingham
was a murderer at heart, and that he wielded a weapon such as no man
had ever used in all the grim history of crime.

Hastie had branched off to his rooms with a few crisp and emphatic
comments upon his friend's unsociability, and Abercrombie Smith crossed
the quadrangle to his corner turret with a strong feeling of repulsion
for his chambers and their associations. He would take Lee's advice,
and move his quarters as soon as possible, for how could a man study
when his ear was ever straining for every murmur or footstep in the
room below? He observed, as he crossed over the lawn, that the light
was still shining in Bellingham's window, and as he passed up the
staircase the door opened, and the man himself looked out at him. With
his fat, evil face he was like some bloated spider fresh from the
weaving of his poisonous web.

"Good-evening," said he. "Won't you come in?"


Explanation

Detailed Explanation of the Excerpt from Round the Red Lamp by Arthur Conan Doyle

Context of the Source

Round the Red Lamp: Being Facts and Fancies of Medical Life (1894) is a collection of short stories by Arthur Conan Doyle, best known as the creator of Sherlock Holmes. Unlike his detective fiction, this work explores medical themes, drawing from Doyle’s own experiences as a physician. The stories blend realism, horror, and psychological suspense, often featuring doctors confronting strange or supernatural phenomena.

This excerpt is from "Lot No. 249", a tale about Abercrombie Smith, a medical student who becomes convinced that his neighbor, Edward Bellingham, is using an ancient Egyptian mummy to commit murders. The story is a Gothic horror piece, blending medical realism with supernatural terror, reflecting 19th-century fascinations with Egyptology, mesmerism, and the occult.


Themes in the Excerpt

  1. The Conflict Between Reason and Superstition

    • Smith is a man of science, trained to trust empirical evidence, yet he is confronted with something that defies logic: a reanimated mummy seemingly controlled by Bellingham.
    • His internal struggle—"how monstrous it was! how unheard of!"—highlights the Victorian tension between rationalism and the supernatural.
    • The passage suggests that some truths lie beyond scientific explanation, a common theme in Gothic and weird fiction.
  2. The Nature of Evil and Moral Corruption

    • Bellingham is described in grotesque, arachnid terms"a bloated spider fresh from the weaving of his poisonous web"—symbolizing predatory malice.
    • The mummy acts as an extension of his will, making him a puppeteer of death, a trope seen in later horror (e.g., The Mummy films).
    • The idea that Bellingham is "a murderer at heart" suggests innate depravity, a concept influenced by 19th-century criminology (e.g., Cesare Lombroso’s theories on "born criminals").
  3. Isolation and Paranoia

    • Smith’s obsessive focus on Bellingham’s actions—"his ear was ever straining for every murmur or footstep"—creates a psychological horror atmosphere.
    • His decision to move out reflects fear of contamination, both literal (the mummy’s presence) and psychological (Bellingham’s influence).
    • The gaslighting element—where others (like Hastie) dismiss his fears as delusion—adds to his isolation, a common Gothic trope.
  4. Medical Anxiety and the Body as a Battleground

    • As a medical student, Smith is hyper-aware of physical and mental health—his mention of a "disordered liver" (then believed to cause melancholy) ties his psychological state to bodily illness.
    • The mummy as a weapon inverts the doctor’s role as healer, turning medicine into a site of horror.

Literary Devices & Stylistic Analysis

  1. Free Indirect Discourse

    • The narration blurs Smith’s thoughts with the author’s voice, creating intimacy and tension:

      "All this settled in his thoughts, together with the many little incidents which had previously turned him against his neighbour..."

    • This technique immerses the reader in Smith’s paranoia, making his suspicions feel immediate and personal.
  2. Gothic Imagery & Symbolism

    • The Mummy as a Monstrous Other:
      • The mummy’s "grisly" reappearance and supernatural mobility (vanishing, attacking) make it a symbol of unresolved past sins (a common Gothic motif).
      • Its Egyptian origin ties into Victorian fears of "foreign corruption" (Egypt was both fascinating and feared as a land of curses).
    • Bellingham as a Spider:
      • The comparison to a "bloated spider" evokes predation, entrapment, and venom—classic Gothic villainy.
      • Spiders were often used in 19th-century literature to represent manipulative evil (e.g., Dracula’s web-like control over victims).
  3. Foreshadowing & Dramatic Irony

    • Bellingham’s **innocuous invitation—"Good-evening," said he. "Won't you come in?"—is sinister in context.
    • The reader (and Smith) knows Bellingham is hiding something, but the casual tone makes it more unsettling.
  4. Repetition for Emphasis

    • The triple exclamation"how monstrous it was! how unheard of! how entirely beyond all bounds of human experience"heightens the horror by emphasizing the unfathomable nature of the crime.
    • The accumulation of details (the missing mummy, the footstep, the attacks) builds inevitability, making Smith’s conclusion feel inescapable.
  5. Medical Jargon as Realism

    • The mention of a "blue pill" (a 19th-century remedy for liver complaints) grounds the story in medical realism, contrasting with the supernatural elements.
    • This juxtaposition makes the horror more disturbing—if a doctor can’t explain it, what hope is there?

Significance of the Passage

  1. A Bridge Between Gothic and Early Horror

    • Unlike traditional Gothic tales (e.g., Frankenstein), which often explore the consequences of scientific hubris, this story blends medical realism with occult horror.
    • It prefigures modern horror tropes, such as:
      • The living dead (zombies/mummies as killers).
      • The unreliable narrator (is Smith paranoid, or is Bellingham really a murderer?).
      • The villain as a puppeteer (Bellingham’s control over the mummy foreshadows later "mastermind" villains).
  2. Reflection of Victorian Fears

    • Egyptomania: The 19th century saw a fascination with Egypt (due to archaeology like the opening of Tutankhamun’s tomb in 1922, though this story predates it), but also fear of curses and ancient evils.
    • Medical Anxiety: With advances in science, there was also distrust of the unknown—what if some forces defied dissection and diagnosis?
    • Urban Isolation: The college setting (with its dark corridors and eerie neighbors) reflects Victorian anxieties about hidden dangers in civilized spaces.
  3. Psychological Depth

    • Smith’s internal conflict—between what he sees and what he’s told to believe—makes the story more than just a monster tale.
    • It explores how fear warps perception, a theme later expanded in Lovecraft’s cosmic horror (where the universe is indifferent to human sanity).

Conclusion: Why This Excerpt Matters

This passage is a masterclass in Gothic suspense, using:

  • Psychological realism (Smith’s spiraling thoughts).
  • Vivid, grotesque imagery (the spider-like Bellingham, the grisly mummy).
  • A blend of science and superstition (medical details vs. supernatural horror).

It challenges the reader to question:

  • Is Smith reliable, or is he losing his mind?
  • Can evil be proven, or does it operate in the shadows?
  • What happens when science fails to explain the unexplainable?

In the broader context of Round the Red Lamp, this story stands out as one of Doyle’s most chilling works, proving that even without Sherlock Holmes, he was a master of tension and dread.


Final Thought

If you’ve ever felt uneasy about a neighbor, or heard a noise in the night and wondered if it was real, this passage captures that primal fear—the fear that some truths are too terrible to face, yet too compelling to ignore.


Questions

Question 1

The passage’s depiction of Smith’s psychological state is most analogous to which of the following literary techniques?

A. The unreliable narration of Poe’s The Tell-Tale Heart, where the protagonist’s fixation on a perceived detail escalates into delusional certainty.
B. The existential dread of Camus’ The Stranger, where the protagonist’s detachment from societal norms leads to moral ambiguity.
C. The stream-of-consciousness of Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway, where fragmented perceptions coalesce into a cohesive but subjective reality.
D. The tragic irony of Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex, where the protagonist’s pursuit of truth inadvertently seals his doom.
E. The satirical hyperbole of Swift’s A Modest Proposal, where outrageous claims are presented with false rationalism to expose societal flaws.

Question 2

The description of Bellingham as a “bloated spider fresh from the weaving of his poisonous web” serves primarily to:

A. Establish his physical grotesqueness as a reflection of his moral decay, aligning with Lombrosian criminological theories of the era.
B. Foreshadow his eventual entrapment by his own schemes, a common trope in Gothic revenge narratives.
C. Contrast his predatory nature with Smith’s scientific rationality, underscoring the conflict between instinct and intellect.
D. Evoke the Victorian fascination with arachnids as symbols of industrial exploitation, given the era’s labor tensions.
E. Suggest an inversion of natural order, where the hunter (Bellingham) is framed as both creator and parasite of his own monstrous design.

Question 3

Smith’s internal monologue—“how monstrous it was! how unheard of! how entirely beyond all bounds of human experience”—is structurally significant because it:

A. Mimics the rhythmic cadence of a legal indictment, reinforcing the idea that Bellingham’s crimes defy conventional justice.
B. Replicates the repetitive compulsions of obsessive thought, mirroring Smith’s descent into paranoid fixation.
C. Parodies the hyperbolic language of sensationalist journalism, critiquing Victorian media’s exploitation of fear.
D. Functions as a chiasmus, where the escalating clauses create a syntactic trap that mirrors Smith’s inability to escape his own reasoning.
E. Invokes the tripartite structure of classical rhetoric (ethos, pathos, logos), with each clause appealing to a different mode of persuasion.

Question 4

The passage’s juxtaposition of medical realism (e.g., the “blue pill”) with supernatural horror most effectively serves to:

A. Highlight the inadequacy of 19th-century medicine in addressing psychological trauma, a critique of contemporary psychiatric practices.
B. Suggest that Smith’s medical training has rendered him incapable of accepting phenomena outside empirical explanation.
C. Create a darkly comic effect, where the mundane (a liver remedy) underscores the absurdity of the supernatural premise.
D. Imply that Bellingham’s crimes are a metaphor for medical malpractice, with the mummy symbolizing the dehumanization of patients.
E. Deepen the uncanny by grounding the fantastic in the familiar, making the supernatural intrusion feel more immediate and threatening.

Question 5

Which of the following best describes the narrative function of Hastie’s dismissal of Smith’s concerns?

A. It provides comic relief, momentarily alleviating the tension before the final confrontation with Bellingham.
B. It reinforces the theme of professional rivalry, suggesting Hastie’s skepticism stems from jealousy of Smith’s intellectual prowess.
C. It serves as a red herring, distracting the reader from the true source of the supernatural events.
D. It isolates Smith further, emphasizing the solipsism of his terror and the impossibility of external validation.
E. It critiques the scientific community’s dogmatic rejection of anecdotal evidence, positioning Smith as a tragic visionary.

Solutions and Explanations

1) Correct answer: A

Why A is most correct: The passage’s portrayal of Smith’s mental state—his fixation on minutiae (the missing mummy, the footstep), his escalating conviction in the face of rational counterarguments, and his visceral certainty despite lacking empirical proof—closely parallels the unreliable narrator of Poe’s The Tell-Tale Heart. Both protagonists construct elaborate justifications for their suspicions, which are grounded in perceived sensory details (the heartbeat in Poe; the mummy’s reappearance here) but resist external validation. The psychological spiral—from vague unease to inescapable “fact”—is the hallmark of Poe’s technique, where the narrator’s subjective horror becomes his reality.

Why the distractors are less supported:

  • B: Camus’ The Stranger deals with existential detachment and moral indifference, not the obsessive, paranoid certainty Smith exhibits. Meursault’s crime is impulsive and affectless; Smith’s conclusions are deliberative and frenzied.
  • C: Woolf’s stream-of-consciousness embrace fragmentation as a means of exploring subjective truth, but Smith’s thoughts are not cohesive—they are accumulative and compulsive, lacking the lyrical introspection of Mrs. Dalloway.
  • D: Oedipus Rex centers on tragic irony—the protagonist’s actions unwittingly fulfill prophecy. Smith, however, is not seeking truth but resisting its denial; his doom is psychological, not fated.
  • E: Swift’s A Modest Proposal uses satirical hyperbole to expose societal flaws, but Smith’s convictions are genuine and personal, not a rhetorical device to critique others.

2) Correct answer: E

Why E is most correct: The spider metaphor inverts natural hierarchies: spiders are both creators (weaving webs) and parasites (feeding on ensnared prey), mirroring Bellingham’s role as the orchestrator of the mummy’s violence while also being dependent on it. The description suggests he is not merely evil but a perversion of agency—a puppeteer who is also a puppet of his own monstrous design. This duality (control and corruption) aligns with the passage’s uncanny horror, where human will and supernatural force blur.

Why the distractors are less supported:

  • A: While Bellingham’s physical grotesqueness may reflect moral decay, the spider imagery is not primarily Lombrosian (which focuses on physiological markers of criminality). The metaphor is more symbolic than pseudoscientific.
  • B: The spider as a self-entrapping figure is plausible, but the passage does not foreshadow Bellingham’s downfall—it emphasizes his active menace. Gothic revenge narratives typically signal the villain’s eventual ruin, but here, the focus is on Smith’s perception of threat.
  • C: The predator vs. rationalist contrast is present, but the spider metaphor does not merely oppose instinct and intellect—it suggests a fusion of the two, with Bellingham weaponizing the supernatural.
  • D: While industrial-era arachnid symbolism (e.g., spiders as exploiters of labor) exists, the passage lacks class-conscious undertones. The horror is personal and supernatural, not socioeconomic.

3) Correct answer: D

Why D is most correct: The triple exclamation forms a chiasmus-like structure (A-B-C, where C traps the reader in Smith’s logic). The syntactic parallelism (“how monstrous… how unheard of… how beyond”) mirrors Smith’s cognitive entrapment: each clause narrows his mental escape, reinforcing the inevitability of his conclusion. The rhetorical escalation (from “monstrous” to “beyond human experience”) mimics the claustrophobia of obsession, a device where form reflects content.

Why the distractors are less supported:

  • A: While the rhythmic repetition resembles a legal indictment, the passage lacks juridical language (e.g., “charges,” “evidence”). The focus is psychological, not forensic.
  • B: The repetitive compulsions of obsessive thought are present, but the structural function is not merely mimetic—it actively imprisons the reader in Smith’s logic, which is more chiastic than stream-of-consciousness.
  • C: The language is not satirical—it is genuinely horrified. Sensationalist journalism exploits fear for effect; Smith’s terror is personal and unironic.
  • E: The tripartite structure does not map cleanly to ethos/pathos/logos. The clauses are emotionally uniform (all pathos), not rhetorically distinct.

4) Correct answer: E

Why E is most correct: The juxtaposition of the mundane (“blue pill”) with the supernatural (the mummy) creates uncanny friction. By grounding the fantastic in medical realism, Doyle makes the horror more visceral: the familiarity of the pill (a symbol of order and science) heightens the violation when the supernatural intrudes. This technique—domesticating the monstrous—is a hallmark of psychological horror, where the proximity of the strange to the ordinary amplifies dread.

Why the distractors are less supported:

  • A: The passage does not critique psychiatry—it uses medical details to enhance verisimilitude, not to indict 19th-century treatments.
  • B: Smith’s incapacity to accept the supernatural is not the focus—the tension arises from the reader’s suspension between skepticism and belief.
  • C: The effect is not darkly comic—the blue pill is not absurd in context but tragically inadequate, underscoring the limits of rationality.
  • D: The mummy is not a metaphor for malpractice—it is a literal (if supernatural) threat. The medical elements serve atmosphere, not allegory.

5) Correct answer: D

Why D is most correct: Hastie’s dismissal isolates Smith by denying his reality, reinforcing the solipsism of his terror. In Gothic tradition, the protagonist’s suffering is often incommunicable—here, Hastie’s crisp, emphatic rejection mirrors societal dismissal of “irrational” fears, leaving Smith trapped in his perception. This lack of validation deepens the psychological horror, as the reader is forced to share Smith’s paranoia without external corroboration.

Why the distractors are less supported:

  • A: Hastie’s exit does not provide comic relief—his abrupt departure heightens tension by removing a potential ally.
  • B: There is no evidence of professional rivalry—Hastie’s skepticism is generic, not personal or jealous.
  • C: Hastie is not a red herring—he is a realistic skeptic, not a distraction from the true villain.
  • E: The passage does not critique the scientific community—it explores the terror of unprovable truths, not institutional dogma. Smith is not a visionary; he is a man haunted by what he cannot prove.