Gutenberg Articles

Appearance

Excerpt ​

Excerpt from The War in the Air, by H. G. Wells

 I.    OF PROGRESS AND THE SMALLWAYS FAMILY<br />
 II.   HOW BERT SMALLWAYS GOT INTO DIFFICULTIES<br />
 III.  THE BALLOON<br />
 IV.   THE GERMAN AIR-FLEET<br />
 V.    THE BATTLE OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC<br />
 VI.   HOW WAR CAME TO NEW YORK<br />
 VII.  THE “VATERLAND” IS DISABLED<br />
 VIII. A WORLD AT WAR<br />
 IX.   ON GOAT ISLAND<br />
 X.    THE WORLD UNDER THE WAR<br />
 XI.   THE GREAT COLLAPSE<br />
 THE EPILOGUE

PREFACE TO REPRINT EDITION

The reader should grasp clearly the date at which this book was written.
It was done in 1907: it appeared in various magazines as a serial in
1908 and it was published in the Fall of that year. At that time the
aeroplane was, for most people, merely a rumour and the “Sausage” held
the air. The contemporary reader has all the advantage of ten years'
experience since this story was imagined. He can correct his author at a
dozen points and estimate the value of these warnings by the standard
of a decade of realities. The book is weak on anti-aircraft guns, for
example, and still more negligent of submarines. Much, no doubt, will
strike the reader as quaint and limited but upon much the writer may not
unreasonably plume himself. The interpretation of the German spirit
must have read as a caricature in 1908. Was it a caricature? Prince
Karl seemed a fantasy then. Reality has since copied Prince Carl with
an astonishing faithfulness. Is it too much to hope that some democratic
“Bert” may not ultimately get even with his Highness? Our author tells
us in this book, as he has told us in others, more especially in The
World Set Free, and as he has been telling us this year in his War
and the Future, that if mankind goes on with war, the smash-up of
civilization is inevitable. It is chaos or the United States of the
World for mankind. There is no other choice. Ten years have but added an
enormous conviction to the message of this book. It remains essentially
right, a pamphlet story--in support of the League to Enforce Peace. K.

Explanation ​

H.G. Wells’ The War in the Air (1908) is a speculative fiction novel that blends adventure, satire, and prophetic warning about the devastating potential of aerial warfare and the fragility of modern civilization. The excerpt provided is the Preface to the Reprint Edition (likely written around 1917–1918, given the reference to "ten years" since the original publication in 1908). Below is a detailed breakdown of the text, focusing on its context, themes, literary devices, and significance, with emphasis on the preface itself.

1. Context of the Preface ​

  • Original Publication (1908): When The War in the Air first appeared, powered flight was in its infancy. The Wright brothers’ first sustained flight had occurred just five years earlier (1903), and dirigibles (like the "Sausage" airships mentioned) were the dominant form of air travel. The idea of large-scale aerial warfare was still speculative, making Wells’ vision seem almost fantastical.
  • Reprint Context (c. 1917–1918): By the time this preface was written, World War I had already seen the rise of aeroplanes as weapons (e.g., dogfights, bombing raids on London by Zeppelin airships, and the use of biplanes for reconnaissance). Submarines (which Wells admits he "negligently" underplayed) had also become a major threat (e.g., the sinking of the Lusitania in 1915). The preface thus serves as a retrospective defense of Wells’ predictions, acknowledging his oversights while doubling down on his core warnings.

2. Key Themes in the Preface ​

A. The Acceleration of Technological War ​

  • Wells highlights how rapidly reality outpaced fiction: In 1908, his descriptions of air fleets and global war seemed exaggerated; by 1918, they were eerily prescient. The preface underscores the unpredictable escalation of warfare—a theme central to the novel, where airpower enables sudden, catastrophic destruction.
  • Anti-aircraft guns and submarines: Wells admits his blind spots, but this admission reinforces his broader point: no one can fully anticipate the horrors of modern war. The gap between his imaginings and reality (e.g., the actual use of poison gas, tanks, and U-boats in WWI) proves how war outstrips even the most alarmist predictions.

B. The German "Spirit" and Prophetic Satire ​

  • Prince Karl vs. Reality: The preface notes that Wells’ fictional German prince (a jingoistic, expansionist aristocrat) was dismissed as a "caricature" in 1908. By 1918, after Germany’s invasion of Belgium and the Kaiser’s militarism, Wells’ portrayal no longer seemed exaggerated. This reflects his satirical critique of German militarism, which he saw as a threat to global stability.
  • Democratic "Bert" as Everyman: The protagonist, Bert Smallways, is a working-class Englishman swept up in the chaos of war. The preface’s hope that a "democratic Bert" might "get even" with autocratic elites suggests Wells’ faith in ordinary people as agents of change—a theme in his later works like The Outline of History (1920), where he advocates for democratic global governance.

C. The Inevitability of Civilizational Collapse ​

  • "Chaos or the United States of the World": The preface distills the novel’s central warning: unchecked militarism and nationalism will destroy civilization. Wells frames the book as a "pamphlet story"—a piece of political propaganda disguised as fiction, urging readers to support a League to Enforce Peace (a precursor to the League of Nations, founded in 1920).
  • The "Great Collapse": The novel’s later chapters (e.g., XI. The Great Collapse) depict societal breakdown due to war. The preface implies that WWI confirmed Wells’ fears: the war had already caused economic ruin, mass death, and the disintegration of old empires (e.g., Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman).

3. Literary Devices in the Preface ​

A. Direct Address to the Reader ​

  • "The reader should grasp clearly...": Wells establishes an intimate, didactic tone, positioning himself as a prophet-teacher. This mirrors the novel’s style, where he often breaks the fourth wall to lecture on politics or technology.
  • Rhetorical Questions: "Was it a caricature?" and "Is it too much to hope..." engage the reader, forcing them to confront the gap between 1908’s skepticism and 1918’s reality.

B. Irony and Self-Deprecation ​

  • "The book is weak on anti-aircraft guns": Wells uses understatement to highlight how reality surpassed his warnings. The irony is that his "failures" (e.g., not predicting submarines’ role) actually strengthen his argument—war is even worse than he imagined.
  • "Quaint and limited": Acknowledging the novel’s datedness (e.g., dirigibles over aeroplanes) makes his correct predictions (e.g., global war, societal collapse) more striking.

C. Repetition for Emphasis ​

  • "Chaos or the United States of the World": This binary choice is repeated in Wells’ later works (e.g., The World Set Free, 1914). The preface frames the novel as part of a consistent, urgent message: unify or perish.

4. Significance of the Preface ​

A. Wells as a Prophet of Modern Warfare ​

  • The preface cements Wells’ reputation as a visionary of 20th-century conflict. While Jules Verne wrote about futuristic technology, Wells focused on its societal impact—predicting not just machines but the psychological and political consequences of war.
  • His warnings about aerial bombing (e.g., the destruction of New York in The War in the Air) foreshadowed the Blitz (1940–41) and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1945).

B. The Novel as Political Manifest ​

  • The preface reveals that The War in the Air was not just entertainment but a call to action. Wells’ support for a League to Enforce Peace aligns with his real-life advocacy (he helped draft the League of Nations’ constitution).
  • The novel’s epilogue (not excerpted here) likely reinforces this, as Wells often used endings to directly address the reader with his political views (e.g., The Time Machine’s critique of class struggle).

C. The "Smallways Family" as Symbols ​

  • The title of Chapter I ("Of Progress and the Smallways Family") hints at Wells’ ambivalence about progress. The Smallways are everyman figures, representing how technological advancement (e.g., flight) can uplift or destroy ordinary lives.
  • Bert’s misadventures (e.g., accidentally joining the war) symbolize how individuals are pawns in geopolitical conflicts—a theme that resonates with the drafted soldiers of WWI.

5. Connection to Wells’ Broader Oeuvre ​

  • Scientific Romance vs. Political Warning: Unlike The Time Machine (1895) or The Island of Doctor Moreau (1896), which critique evolution and ethics, The War in the Air is more explicitly anti-war. It bridges Wells’ early scientific romances and his later polemic nonfiction (e.g., The War That Will End War, 1914).
  • League of Nations Advocacy: The preface’s mention of The World Set Free (1914) and War and the Future (1917) shows how Wells repeatedly returned to this theme, using fiction to mobilize public opinion against war.

6. Why the Preface Matters Today ​

  • Echoes in Modern Conflicts: The preface’s warnings about unrestrained military technology (e.g., drones, cyberwarfare) remain relevant. Wells’ fear of asymmetric warfare (where weak states or non-state actors exploit advanced tech) predicts modern threats like terrorism and AI-driven conflict.
  • Global Governance Debates: The "United States of the World" idea resurfaces in discussions about climate change, nuclear proliferation, and pandemics—crises that, like war, require international cooperation.
  • The Role of Fiction in Activism: Wells’ blend of storytelling and advocacy foreshadows modern cli-fi (climate fiction) and dystopian warnings (e.g., The Handmaid’s Tale, Oryx and Crake), where authors use narrative to spur political action.

Conclusion: The Preface as a Time Capsule ​

The preface to The War in the Air is a meta-commentary on prediction and failure. Wells acknowledges his technical inaccuracies but doubles down on his moral argument: that war is a self-destructive force and civilization’s survival depends on unity. The text serves as:

  1. A defense of speculative fiction as a tool for political foresight.
  2. A humble admission that reality can outpace even the most imaginative warnings.
  3. A call to heed history—lest the "Great Collapse" of his novel become our future.

In an era of hypersonic missiles, AI arms races, and nuclear brinkmanship, Wells’ century-old preface reads like a ghostly dispatch from the past, urging us to ask: Have we learned anything?