Gutenberg Articles

Appearance

Excerpt ​

Excerpt from History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 4, by Edward Gibbon

Zeno And Anastasius, Emperors Of The East.—Birth, Education, And First
Exploits Of Theodoric The Ostrogoth.—His Invasion And Conquest Of
Italy.—The Gothic Kingdom Of Italy.—State Of The West.—Military And
Civil Government.—The Senator Boethius.—Last Acts And Death Of
Theodoric.

  After the fall of the Roman empire in the West, an interval of<br />
  fifty years, till the memorable reign of Justinian, is faintly<br />
  marked by the obscure names and imperfect annals of Zeno,<br />
  Anastasius, and Justin, who successively ascended to the throne<br />
  of Constantinople. During the same period, Italy revived and<br />
  flourished under the government of a Gothic king, who might have<br />
  deserved a statue among the best and bravest of the ancient<br />
  Romans.

  Theodoric the Ostrogoth, the fourteenth in lineal descent of the<br />
  royal line of the Amali, 1 was born in the neighborhood of Vienna<br />
  2 two years after the death of Attila. 2111 A recent victory had<br />
  restored the independence of the Ostrogoths; and the three<br />
  brothers, Walamir, Theodemir, and Widimir, who ruled that warlike<br />
  nation with united counsels, had separately pitched their<br />
  habitations in the fertile though desolate province of Pannonia.<br />
  The Huns still threatened their revolted subjects, but their<br />
  hasty attack was repelled by the single forces of Walamir, and<br />
  the news of his victory reached the distant camp of his brother<br />
  in the same auspicious moment that the favorite concubine of<br />
  Theodemir was delivered of a son and heir. In the eighth year of<br />
  his age, Theodoric was reluctantly yielded by his father to the<br />
  public interest, as the pledge of an alliance which Leo, emperor<br />
  of the East, had consented to purchase by an annual subsidy of<br />
  three hundred pounds of gold. The royal hostage was educated at<br />
  Constantinople with care and tenderness. His body was formed to<br />
  all the exercises of war, his mind was expanded by the habits of<br />
  liberal conversation; he frequented the schools of the most<br />
  skilful masters; but he disdained or neglected the arts of<br />
  Greece, and so ignorant did he always remain of the first<br />
  elements of science, that a rude mark was contrived to represent<br />
  the signature of the illiterate king of Italy. 3 As soon as he<br />
  had attained the age of eighteen, he was restored to the wishes<br />
  of the Ostrogoths, whom the emperor aspired to gain by liberality<br />
  and confidence. Walamir had fallen in battle; the youngest of the<br />
  brothers, Widimir, had led away into Italy and Gaul an army of<br />
  Barbarians, and the whole nation acknowledged for their king the<br />
  father of Theodoric. His ferocious subjects admired the strength<br />
  and stature of their young prince; 4 and he soon convinced them<br />
  that he had not degenerated from the valor of his ancestors. At<br />
  the head of six thousand volunteers, he secretly left the camp in<br />
  quest of adventures, descended the Danube as far as Singidunum,<br />
  or Belgrade, and soon returned to his father with the spoils of a<br />
  Sarmatian king whom he had vanquished and slain. Such triumphs,<br />
  however, were productive only of fame, and the invincible<br />
  Ostrogoths were reduced to extreme distress by the want of<br />
  clothing and food. They unanimously resolved to desert their<br />
  Pannonian encampments, and boldly to advance into the warm and<br />
  wealthy neighborhood of the Byzantine court, which already<br />
  maintained in pride and luxury so many bands of confederate<br />
  Goths. After proving, by some acts of hostility, that they could<br />
  be dangerous, or at least troublesome, enemies, the Ostrogoths<br />
  sold at a high price their reconciliation and fidelity, accepted<br />
  a donative of lands and money, and were intrusted with the<br />
  defence of the Lower Danube, under the command of Theodoric, who<br />
  succeeded after his father’s death to the hereditary throne of<br />
  the Amali. 5

Explanation ​

Detailed Explanation of the Excerpt from The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (Volume 4) by Edward Gibbon ​

This passage from Gibbon’s magnum opus introduces Theodoric the Great, the Ostrogothic king who ruled Italy in the late 5th and early 6th centuries, bridging the gap between the fall of the Western Roman Empire (476 AD) and the reign of the Byzantine emperor Justinian (527–565 AD). Gibbon’s narrative is rich in historical detail, thematic depth, and stylistic sophistication, offering both a biographical sketch of Theodoric and a broader commentary on the transition from Roman to barbarian rule in Europe.

1. Context of the Excerpt ​

Gibbon’s Decline and Fall traces the collapse of the Roman Empire from its height under Augustus to the fall of Constantinople in 1453. This particular section (Book 39, Chapter 36) focuses on the post-Roman West, where Germanic kingdoms replaced Roman authority. The excerpt contrasts the weakness of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) emperors (Zeno, Anastasius, Justin) with the rise of Theodoric, a barbarian king who, paradoxically, governed Italy with Roman-like efficiency.

Key historical background:

  • The Western Roman Empire fell in 476 AD when the Germanic chieftain Odoacer deposed Romulus Augustulus.
  • The Eastern Empire (Byzantium) survived, but its emperors struggled to maintain control over the Balkans and Italy.
  • The Ostrogoths, a Germanic tribe, had been subjects of the Huns under Attila but regained independence after his death (453 AD).
  • Theodoric (454–526 AD) emerged as their leader, eventually conquering Italy (493 AD) and ruling it as a Romanized barbarian king until his death.

2. Summary of the Text ​

Gibbon’s passage can be divided into three main sections:

A. The Obscurity of Eastern Emperors (Zeno, Anastasius, Justin) ​

  • Gibbon dismisses the Eastern emperors of this period as unremarkable, describing their reigns as "faintly marked by obscure names and imperfect annals."
  • This sets up a contrast with Theodoric, whom he praises as a figure worthy of a "statue among the best and bravest of the ancient Romans."
  • Thematic significance: Gibbon suggests that while the East declined into mediocrity, the West revived under barbarian rule—a paradoxical but deliberate point in his argument that Rome’s fall was not an unmitigated disaster.

B. Theodoric’s Early Life and Rise to Power ​

Gibbon provides a dramatic and almost mythic account of Theodoric’s origins:

  1. Noble Lineage:
    • Theodoric is the 14th in the royal line of the Amali, a dynasty of Ostrogothic kings.
    • His birth (454 AD, near Vienna) coincides with the restoration of Ostrogothic independence after Attila’s death, symbolizing a new era.
  2. A Propitious Birth:
    • His father, Theodemir, receives news of a victory over the Huns at the same moment Theodoric is born—a classical literary device (parallelism) suggesting divine favor.
  3. Hostage in Constantinople (462–471 AD):
    • At age 8, Theodoric is sent as a hostage to Emperor Leo I, a common Roman practice to secure alliances.
    • His education in Constantinople is dual:
      • Military training: His body is "formed to all the exercises of war."
      • Cultural exposure: He attends schools but rejects Greek learning, remaining illiterate (a detail Gibbon uses to contrast him with Roman emperors).
    • His signature is a "rude mark", emphasizing his barbarian roots despite his Romanized rule.
  4. Return and Early Leadership:
    • At 18, he returns to the Ostrogoths, who are now led by his father (his uncles Walamir and Widimir having died or departed).
    • He proves his worth by leading a raid against the Sarmatians, returning with spoils—an early sign of his military genius.
  5. The Ostrogoths’ Migration and Alliance with Byzantium:
    • Facing starvation in Pannonia, the Ostrogoths move toward the Byzantine border, where they extort money and land in exchange for military service.
    • Theodoric becomes their commander and later king, setting the stage for his invasion of Italy.

C. The Gothic Kingdom of Italy (Implied) ​

  • Though not fully described in this excerpt, Gibbon hints at Theodoric’s later conquest of Italy (493 AD) and his 33-year reign, which he will portray as a golden age of barbarian-Roman synthesis.

3. Key Themes ​

Gibbon’s passage explores several major themes:

A. The Paradox of Barbarian Virtue vs. Roman Decadence ​

  • Gibbon inverts traditional Roman prejudices: While the Eastern emperors are weak and forgettable, the barbarian Theodoric is a strong, capable ruler who might have been worthy of Roman statues.
  • This reflects Gibbon’s Enlightenment-era skepticism toward blind admiration of Rome; he often praises barbarian energy over Roman corruption.

B. The Fusion of Roman and Germanic Worlds ​

  • Theodoric’s education in Constantinople symbolizes the cultural exchange between Romans and Goths.
  • His illiteracy is noted not as a flaw but as a mark of his barbarian identity, yet he governs Italy with Roman administrative skill—a hybrid leadership that Gibbon admires.

C. Fortune and Providence in History ​

  • Theodoric’s birth during a victory over the Huns suggests divine favor, a common trope in classical historiography (e.g., Livy, Tacitus).
  • His rise from hostage to king reflects the role of chance and personal virtue in shaping history—a key theme in Gibbon’s work.

D. The Decline of the East and Revival of the West ​

  • While the Eastern Empire stagnates, Italy flourishes under Theodoric, challenging the notion that Rome’s fall was an unmitigated disaster.
  • This sets up Gibbon’s later argument that Justinian’s reconquest of Italy (535–554 AD) was destructive, undoing Theodoric’s stable rule.

4. Literary Devices and Style ​

Gibbon’s prose is elegant, ironic, and rich in classical allusions. Key devices in this passage:

A. Juxtaposition and Contrast ​

  • Weak East vs. Strong West:
    • "Obscure names and imperfect annals" (Eastern emperors) vs. Theodoric, who "might have deserved a statue among the best and bravest of the ancient Romans."
  • Barbarian vs. Roman:
    • Theodoric is illiterate but militarily brilliant, while Roman emperors are cultivated but ineffective.

B. Dramatic Irony and Foreshadowing ​

  • Theodoric’s early raid against the Sarmatians foreshadows his later conquest of Italy.
  • His education in Constantinople hints at his future Romanized rule, blending Gothic and Roman traditions.

C. Classical Allusions and Mythic Tone ​

  • The simultaneous victory and birth echoes legendary Roman foundations (e.g., Romulus and Remus).
  • The hostage narrative recalls classical examples (e.g., Julius Caesar in Asia Minor, young noble hostages in Sparta).

D. Gibbon’s Sarcasm and Subtle Criticism ​

  • The phrase "the emperor aspired to gain [the Ostrogoths] by liberality and confidence" is ironic—the "liberality" is actually bribery, and the "confidence" is forced trust.
  • The donative of lands and money is framed as a purchase of loyalty, not a genuine alliance.

5. Historical and Literary Significance ​

A. Theodoric as a Model Ruler ​

  • Gibbon presents Theodoric as an ideal ruler: strong, just, and capable of uniting Romans and Goths.
  • His reign is later contrasted with Justinian’s destructive wars, reinforcing Gibbon’s argument that barbarian rule was often better than Byzantine misgovernment.

B. The Decline and Fall Thesis ​

  • This passage supports Gibbon’s broader claim that the fall of Rome was not a sudden collapse but a gradual transformation, with barbarian kingdoms preserving Roman institutions in new forms.

C. Influence on Later Historiography ​

  • Gibbon’s sympathetic portrayal of Theodoric influenced later historians (e.g., Thomas Hodgkin in Italy and Her Invaders).
  • His skepticism toward Byzantine rule shaped modern views of the transition from antiquity to the Middle Ages.

D. Enlightenment Values in Gibbon’s Work ​

  • Gibbon challenges ethnic and cultural prejudices by praising a barbarian king.
  • His emphasis on governance over heritage reflects Enlightenment ideals of meritocracy and rational leadership.

6. Close Reading of Key Passages ​

A. "The royal hostage was educated at Constantinople with care and tenderness." ​

  • "Care and tenderness" is ironic—Theodoric is a hostage, not a guest, but the Romans treat him well to secure Gothic loyalty.
  • His rejection of Greek learning is significant: Gibbon suggests that practical wisdom (war, governance) matters more than bookish knowledge.

B. "He disdained or neglected the arts of Greece, and so ignorant did he always remain of the first elements of science..." ​

  • This seems like a criticism, but Gibbon later shows that Theodoric’s illiteracy did not prevent effective rule.
  • The "rude mark" as his signature becomes a symbol of his barbarian identity, yet he governs like a Roman.

C. "The invincible Ostrogoths were reduced to extreme distress by the want of clothing and food." ​

  • The contrast between "invincible" and "extreme distress" highlights the harsh realities of barbarian life, forcing them to migrate and negotiate with Byzantium.
  • Their extortion of land and money is framed as pragmatic survival, not mere greed.

D. "They unanimously resolved to desert their Pannonian encampments, and boldly to advance into the warm and wealthy neighborhood of the Byzantine court..." ​

  • "Boldly" suggests agency and ambition, not just desperation.
  • The Byzantine court’s "pride and luxury" is a recurring critique in Gibbon—wealthy but decadent, while the Goths are poor but vigorous.

7. Conclusion: Why This Passage Matters ​

Gibbon’s account of Theodoric is more than a biography—it is a meditation on power, culture, and historical change. By elevating a barbarian king above Roman emperors, Gibbon:

  1. Challenges traditional narratives of Roman superiority.
  2. Highlights the resilience of post-Roman Europe, where Germanic rulers preserved Roman institutions.
  3. Uses Theodoric as a foil to critique Byzantine weakness and later imperial overreach (e.g., Justinian’s wars).
  4. Embodies Enlightenment historiography, blending erudition, irony, and moral philosophy.

This passage is a microcosm of Gibbon’s genius: it entertains with dramatic storytelling, educates with historical depth, and provokes with subversive ideas—all while maintaining the elegant prose style that makes Decline and Fall a literary masterpiece.