Appearance
Excerpt
Excerpt from A Study in Scarlet, by Arthur Conan Doyle
Its invisibility, and the mystery which was attached to it, made this
organization doubly terrible. It appeared to be omniscient and
omnipotent, and yet was neither seen nor heard. The man who held out
against the Church vanished away, and none knew whither he had gone or
what had befallen him. His wife and his children awaited him at home,
but no father ever returned to tell them how he had fared at the hands
of his secret judges. A rash word or a hasty act was followed by
annihilation, and yet none knew what the nature might be of this
terrible power which was suspended over them. No wonder that men went
about in fear and trembling, and that even in the heart of the
wilderness they dared not whisper the doubts which oppressed them.
At first this vague and terrible power was exercised only upon the
recalcitrants who, having embraced the Mormon faith, wished afterwards
to pervert or to abandon it. Soon, however, it took a wider range. The
supply of adult women was running short, and polygamy without a female
population on which to draw was a barren doctrine indeed. Strange
rumours began to be bandied about—rumours of murdered immigrants and
rifled camps in regions where Indians had never been seen. Fresh women
appeared in the harems of the Elders—women who pined and wept, and bore
upon their faces the traces of an unextinguishable horror. Belated
wanderers upon the mountains spoke of gangs of armed men, masked,
stealthy, and noiseless, who flitted by them in the darkness. These
tales and rumours took substance and shape, and were corroborated and
re-corroborated, until they resolved themselves into a definite name.
To this day, in the lonely ranches of the West, the name of the Danite
Band, or the Avenging Angels, is a sinister and an ill-omened one.
Fuller knowledge of the organization which produced such terrible
results served to increase rather than to lessen the horror which it
inspired in the minds of men. None knew who belonged to this ruthless
society. The names of the participators in the deeds of blood and
violence done under the name of religion were kept profoundly secret.
The very friend to whom you communicated your misgivings as to the
Prophet and his mission, might be one of those who would come forth at
night with fire and sword to exact a terrible reparation. Hence every
man feared his neighbour, and none spoke of the things which were
nearest his heart.
Explanation
This excerpt from A Study in Scarlet (1887), the first novel featuring Sherlock Holmes, is a dark and atmospheric passage that explores the oppressive power of the Danite Band (or Avenging Angels), a secretive and violent enforcer arm of the early Mormon Church in 19th-century Utah. While the novel is a detective story, this section serves as exposition and historical context, framing the backstory of the villain, Jefferson Hope, whose quest for revenge against the Mormons drives the plot. Below is a detailed breakdown of the passage, focusing on its themes, tone, literary devices, and significance within the text itself.
Context Within the Novel
A Study in Scarlet is divided into two parts:
- Part I (London, present-day) – Introduces Holmes and Watson solving a murder in London.
- Part I (Utah, flashback) – Reveals the backstory of the killer, Jefferson Hope, whose fiancée was forcibly married to a Mormon Elder, leading to her death and his vengeance.
This excerpt comes from the Utah flashback, where Doyle describes the Danite Band, a real (though controversial) historical group accused of enforcing Mormon orthodoxy through intimidation, kidnapping, and murder. The passage establishes the climate of fear that justifies Hope’s later actions.
Themes in the Excerpt
Tyranny and Secret Power
- The Danite Band is portrayed as an invisible, omniscient force—neither seen nor heard, yet capable of making dissenters "vanish." This creates a Kafkaesque atmosphere where the rules are unclear, but the punishments are absolute.
- The phrase "The man who held out against the Church vanished away" suggests state-sanctioned disappearance, a tactic of totalitarian regimes.
Religious Fanaticism and Control
- The passage critiques dogmatic religion when it becomes a tool for oppression. The Mormons (as depicted here) use faith to justify polygamy, kidnapping, and murder.
- The line "polygamy without a female population on which to draw was a barren doctrine indeed" is darkly ironic—it frames polygamy as a practical problem rather than a moral one, reducing women to commodities to be "supplied."
Fear and Paranoia
- The unknown nature of the threat ("none knew what the nature might be of this terrible power") amplifies terror. People fear not just the Danites but each other, as "the very friend to whom you communicated your misgivings... might be one of those who would come forth at night with fire and sword."
- This creates a society of silence, where "none spoke of the things which were nearest his heart"—a chilling depiction of psychological oppression.
Violence Against Women
- The passage describes "fresh women" appearing in harems, "who pined and wept, and bore upon their faces the traces of an unextinguishable horror." This implies sexual violence and coercion, framing polygamy as a system of captivity.
- The rumours of "murdered immigrants and rifled camps" suggest that women were abducted to sustain the Mormon practice.
The Myth of the "Avenging Angels"
- The Danites are given a supernatural aura—they are "masked, stealthy, and noiseless," moving like ghosts. The name "Avenging Angels" ironically twists religious imagery, portraying them as divine executioners rather than benevolent beings.
Literary Devices & Stylistic Choices
Imagery of Invisibility and Omnipresence
- "Invisibility... mystery... omniscient and omnipotent, and yet was neither seen nor heard."
- The Danites are everywhere and nowhere, a faceless threat that instills dread. This mirrors Gothic horror tropes (e.g., unseen monsters, paranoia).
- "flitted by them in the darkness" – The verb "flitted" (like a ghost or bat) enhances their phantom-like quality.
- "Invisibility... mystery... omniscient and omnipotent, and yet was neither seen nor heard."
Repetition for Emphasis
- "None knew whither he had gone or what had befallen him... none knew what the nature might be of this terrible power... none knew who belonged to this ruthless society."
- The anaphora ("none knew") reinforces the unknowability of the threat, making it more terrifying.
- "None knew whither he had gone or what had befallen him... none knew what the nature might be of this terrible power... none knew who belonged to this ruthless society."
Sensory and Emotional Language
- "women who pined and wept, and bore upon their faces the traces of an unextinguishable horror."
- The words "pined," "wept," and "unextinguishable horror" evoke suffering and trauma, making the violence visceral.
- "fire and sword" – A biblical allusion (Revelation 13:14) that frames the Danites as apocalyptic enforcers.
- "women who pined and wept, and bore upon their faces the traces of an unextinguishable horror."
Rumour and Urban Legend
- The passage builds tension through hearsay: "Strange rumours began to be bandied about... Fresh women appeared... Belated wanderers spoke of gangs..."
- This mimics folklore or campfire stories, where terror grows through retellings ("corroborated and re-corroborated").
- The passage builds tension through hearsay: "Strange rumours began to be bandied about... Fresh women appeared... Belated wanderers spoke of gangs..."
Irony
- The Danites are called "Avenging Angels"—a mockery of divine justice, as their "vengeance" is brutal and unholy.
- The idea that "the very friend" could be a secret Danite twists trust into betrayal.
Significance in the Novel
Justification for Jefferson Hope’s Revenge
- The passage sympathizes with Hope’s vendetta by showing the Mormon Church as a tyrannical regime. His later murders (in London) are framed as retributive justice rather than mere crime.
- Doyle’s biased portrayal (Mormons were already controversial in Victorian England) serves to vilify the Church and excuse Hope’s violence.
Contrast with Sherlock Holmes’ Rationality
- The superstitious terror of the Danites contrasts with Holmes’ logical deductive methods. While Utah is a land of fear and myth, London is a place of reason and evidence.
- This reinforces the Victorian belief in progress—the "civilized" world (England) is rational, while the "wild" West is lawless and superstitious.
Gothic and Sensationalist Tone
- The excerpt leans into Gothic horror (secret societies, disappearances, masked men) to heighten suspense.
- This was popular in 19th-century literature (e.g., Wilkie Collins’ The Woman in White), where mystery and dread drove narratives.
Historical (In)Accuracy & Anti-Mormon Sentiment
- Doyle exaggerates the Danites’ activities (historically, their role is debated). His portrayal reflects Victorian prejudices against Mormons, who were seen as cult-like and immoral due to polygamy.
- The passage others the Mormons, depicting them as foreign and threatening—a common trope in colonial-era literature.
Key Takeaways from the Text Itself
- The Danites are not just killers—they are a psychological weapon, turning society against itself through fear.
- The unknown is scarier than the known—Doyle exploits this by never fully revealing the Danites’ methods.
- The passage blurs religion and terror, suggesting that faith, when perverted, becomes a tool of control.
- The women’s suffering is central—it’s not just about murder, but systematic oppression under the guise of doctrine.
Conclusion
This excerpt is a masterclass in building atmospheric dread. Through vivid imagery, repetition, and rumour, Doyle constructs a nightmarish vision of theocratic tyranny. While serving the plot (justifying Hope’s revenge), it also critiques blind faith and unchecked power. The fear of the unseen—whether in the form of secret police, masked gangs, or betrayal by neighbors—makes this passage timeless in its horror, resonating with themes of totalitarianism and surveillance that remain relevant today.
Questions
Question 1
The passage’s depiction of the Danite Band primarily serves to evoke a sense of dread through its emphasis on:
A. the explicit brutality of their methods, described in visceral, graphic detail.
B. the hypocrisy of religious institutions that preach compassion yet sanction violence.
C. the psychological torment of living under an unseen, omnipresent threat.
D. the systematic erosion of familial bonds as men are disappeared without trace.
E. the economic exploitation of women as commodities in a polygamous society.
Question 2
The phrase "polygamy without a female population on which to draw was a barren doctrine indeed" functions rhetorically to:
A. expose the logical inconsistency of Mormon theological justifications.
B. highlight the desperation of Mormon leaders to sustain their social structure.
C. underscore the absurdity of polygamy as a practice divorced from spiritual intent.
D. critique the reduction of women to reproductive and domestic assets.
E. reveal the pragmatic, almost transactional underpinnings of the Danites’ violence.
Question 3
The passage’s repeated use of the phrase "none knew" (e.g., "none knew whither he had gone," "none knew what the nature might be") is most effectively interpreted as a stylistic device to:
A. mimic the cognitive dissonance of a society trapped in collective ignorance.
B. emphasize the Danites’ supernatural omniscience by contrast with human blindness.
C. create a rhythmic, incantatory quality that heightens the Gothic tone.
D. underscore the failure of individual agency in the face of institutional power.
E. parody the Mormon doctrine of divine mystery by inverting it into terror.
Question 4
The "sinister and ill-omened" reputation of the Danite Band, as described in the passage, derives its power most significantly from:
A. the explicit linkage between religious fervor and state-sanctioned murder.
B. the transformation of rumor into an almost mythological force.
C. the contrast between the band’s angelic nomenclature and their demonic actions.
D. the implication that complicity in their crimes is both invisible and universal.
E. the suggestion that their violence is a perversion of frontier justice.
Question 5
Which of the following best captures the passage’s implicit argument about the relationship between fear and power?
A. Power is most effectively consolidated through the monopolization of violence.
B. Fear is most potent when its source is diffuse, unlocatable, and self-replicating.
C. Theological power structures inevitably collapse under the weight of their own hypocrisy.
D. Oppressive regimes rely on the complicity of bystanders to maintain their authority.
E. The terror of the unknown is inherently less durable than the terror of the known.
Solutions and Explanations
1) Correct answer: C
Why C is most correct: The passage’s dread stems not from graphic descriptions of violence (which are notably absent) but from the psychological suffocation of living under a threat that is everywhere and nowhere. The Danites’ power lies in their invisibility ("neither seen nor heard") and the paralyzing uncertainty they instill ("none knew whither he had gone"). This aligns with Gothic and Kafkaesque traditions, where the unknowable is more terrifying than the overt. The repetition of "none knew" (Q3) further reinforces this interpretation, as it mirrors the cognitive disorientation of the oppressed.
Why the distractors are less supported:
- A: The passage avoids explicit brutality; violence is implied (e.g., "fire and sword") but never graphically rendered. The terror is atmospheric, not visceral.
- B: While hypocrisy is a theme, the primary focus is on the mechanics of fear, not moral critique. The passage doesn’t dwell on doctrinal contradictions.
- D: Familial bonds are mentioned ("wife and children awaited him"), but this is a consequence of the fear, not its source. The core dread is the omnipresent threat, not the erosion of family.
- E: Economic exploitation is a secondary theme (e.g., women as "supply"). The passage’s dominant tone is psychological horror, not socioeconomic analysis.
2) Correct answer: E
Why E is most correct: The line is darkly pragmatic: it frames polygamy as a system dependent on resource acquisition (women) and implies that the Danites’ violence is a logistical solution to a demographic problem. The word "barren" (usually associated with land or fertility) is repurposed to describe a doctrine’s failure to function without raw materials—here, women. This reveals the transactional logic underpinning the Danites’ crimes: kidnapping and murder are means to an institutional end.
Why the distractors are less supported:
- A: The passage doesn’t engage with theological inconsistency; it’s concerned with practical enforcement, not abstract debate.
- B: While desperation is implied, the line’s cynical tone ("barren doctrine") suggests calculating pragmatism, not panic.
- C: The absurdity of polygamy isn’t the focus; the line treats it as a system with functional requirements, not a spiritual farce.
- D: The reduction of women to assets is present, but the phrase’s primary work is exposing the utilitarian motive for violence, not critiquing misogyny.
3) Correct answer: A
Why A is most correct: The anaphora ("none knew") doesn’t just create rhythm or contrast—it simulates the mental state of the oppressed. The repetition enforces a sense of trapped ignorance, where every avenue of knowledge is foreclosed. This aligns with the passage’s broader theme of psychological paralysis: people are aware of the threat but powerless to define or resist it. The device thus enacts the very confusion it describes.
Why the distractors are less supported:
- B: The Danites aren’t framed as supernatural; their power is human-made (secret societies, informants). The passage avoids occult overtones.
- C: While rhythmic, the repetition’s primary effect is thematic, not aesthetic. Gothic tone is a vehicle, not the end goal.
- D: Individual agency is a minor theme. The focus is on collective terror, not personal failure.
- E: The passage doesn’t parody Mormon doctrine; it co-opts religious language ("Avenging Angels") to heighten dread, but the "none knew" refrain isn’t ironic—it’s literal and oppressive.
4) Correct answer: D
Why D is most correct: The Danites’ reputation is sinister precisely because anyone could be complicit. The line "the very friend to whom you communicated your misgivings... might be one of those who would come forth at night" suggests that the threat is embedded in the social fabric. This universal potential for betrayal makes the fear inescapable—unlike a visible enemy, the Danites could be anyone, rendering trust impossible.
Why the distractors are less supported:
- A: The linkage between religion and violence is explicit, but the reputation’s power comes from ubiquity, not just the fusion of church and state.
- B: Rumor is important, but the passage grounds the myth in tangible social mechanics (e.g., masked gangs, disappeared men). The terror isn’t just folklore.
- C: The ironic naming ("Avenging Angels") is noticed, but the deeper horror is the banality of complicity—not the contrast between name and deed.
- E: Frontier justice is not the frame; the Danites are not vigilantes but institutional enforcers. The passage critiques organized tyranny, not ad-hoc violence.
5) Correct answer: B
Why B is most correct: The passage’s central mechanism of fear is the diffuse, self-replicating nature of the threat. The Danites’ power lies in their invisibility ("neither seen nor heard"), their potential ubiquity ("the very friend might be one of them"), and the social silence they enforce ("none spoke of the things nearest his heart"). Fear feeds on itself because its source is unlocatable—this is far more potent than a visible oppressor (e.g., a tyrant with an army). The passage aligns with Foucault’s concept of panopticism: control through the possibility of being watched, not the reality.
Why the distractors are less supported:
- A: Monopolization of violence is part of the Danites’ power, but the passage emphasizes psychological control over physical force.
- C: The passage doesn’t suggest inevitable collapse; if anything, the system appears self-sustaining through fear.
- D: Bystander complicity is mentioned, but the core argument is about the structure of fear, not the moral failure of individuals.
- E: The passage contradicts this: the terror of the unknown (Danites) is more durable than a known threat (e.g., a visible army). The fear persists because it’s never fully confirmed or dispelled.