Excerpt

Excerpt from The Works of Samuel Johnson, in Sixteen Volumes. Volume 04, by Samuel Johnson

BY SAMUEL JOHNSON

CONTENTS

No.
171 Misella's description of the life of a prostitute.
172 The effect of sudden riches upon the manners.
173 Unreasonable fears of pedantry.
174 The mischiefs of unbounded raillery. History of Dicaculus
175 The majority are wicked.
176 Directions to authors attacked by criticks. The various
degrees of critical perspicacity.
177 An account of a club of antiquaries.
178 Many advantages not to be enjoyed together.
179 The awkward merriment of a student.
180 The study of life not to be neglected for the sake of books.
181 The history of an adventurer in lotteries.
182 The history of Leviculus, the fortune-hunter.
183 The influence of envy and interest compared.
184 The subject of essays often suggested by chance.
Chance equally prevalent in other affairs
185 The prohibition of revenge justifiable by reason. The
meanness of regulating our conduct by the opinions of men
186 Anningait and Ajut; a Greenland history
187 The history of Anningait and Ajut concluded
188 Favour often gained with little assistance from understanding.
189 The mischiefs of falsehood. The character of Turpicula.
190 The history of Abouzaid, the son of Morad.
191 The busy life of a young lady.
192 Love unsuccessful without riches.
193 The author's art of praising himself.
194 A young nobleman's progress in politeness..
195 A young nobleman's introduction to the knowledge of the town.
196 Human opinions mutable. The hopes of youth fallacious.
197 The history of a legacy-hunter.
198 The legacy-hunter's history concluded.
199 The virtues of Rabbi Abraham's magnet.
200 Asper's complaint of the insolence of Prospero
Unpoliteness not always the effect of pride.
201 The importance of punctuality.
202 The different acceptations of poverty. Cynicks and Monks not poor.
203 The pleasures of life to be sought in prospects of futurity.
Future fame uncertain.
204 The history of ten days of Seged, emperour of Ethiopia.
205 The history of Seged concluded.
206 The art of living at the cost of others.
207 The folly of continuing too long upon the stage.
208 The Rambler's reception. His design.

---

Explanation

The excerpt you’ve provided is the table of contents from Volume 4 of The Works of Samuel Johnson, specifically listing the essays from The Rambler (Nos. 171–208). The Rambler was a periodical essay series (1750–1752) written almost entirely by Samuel Johnson, one of the most influential literary figures of the 18th century. These essays blend moral philosophy, social criticism, literary analysis, and fictional narratives to explore human nature, ethics, and the complexities of society.

Since this is a table of contents rather than a full essay, my analysis will focus on:

1. The nature of The Rambler and its place in Johnson’s work
2. Themes and patterns in the listed essays
3. Literary devices and structural techniques
4. The significance of these titles in Johnson’s moral and rhetorical project

---

1. Context: The Rambler as a Periodical Essay

The Rambler was Johnson’s second major essay series (after The Adventurer and before The Idler), modeled after earlier periodicals like Addison and Steele’s The Spectator. Unlike its predecessors, which often aimed at light, witty social commentary, The Rambler is:

• More didactic and moralistic – Johnson uses it to instruct, admonish, and reflect on human folly.
• Structurally varied – Some essays are direct moral lectures, others are allegorical tales (e.g., "Anningait and Ajut"), and some are satirical character sketches (e.g., "Turpicula," "Leviculus").
• Written in a elevated, Latinate prose style – Johnson’s sentences are complex, his vocabulary rich, and his tone often authoritative and solemn.

The title "The Rambler" suggests a wanderer through life’s moral and intellectual landscapes, observing and commenting on human behavior. The essays were published twice weekly, and Johnson wrote nearly all of them himself—a monumental feat of sustained intellectual labor.

---

2. Themes in the Listed Essays (Nos. 171–208)

The titles reveal several recurring themes in Johnson’s moral and social philosophy:

A. Moral and Social Critique

• Human Vice and Folly

  • No. 175: "The majority are wicked." → Johnson’s pessimistic view of human nature (influenced by his Christian belief in original sin).
  • No. 189: "The mischiefs of falsehood. The character of Turpicula." → A satirical portrait of a deceitful person (Turpicula = "the vile one").
  • No. 183: "The influence of envy and interest compared." → Johnson often contrasts base motives (envy, greed) with noble ones (reason, virtue).

• Social Hypocrisy and Vanity

  • No. 172: "The effect of sudden riches upon the manners." → Wealth corrupts character (a common 18th-century concern, e.g., in The Beggar’s Opera).
  • No. 192: "Love unsuccessful without riches." → A cynical take on marriage and social mobility (reflecting the era’s mercenary marriage market).
  • No. 194–195: "A young nobleman’s progress in politeness / introduction to the knowledge of the town." → Satire of aristocratic dissipation (London’s corrupting influence on the gentry).

B. Literary and Intellectual Concerns

• The Dangers of Pedantry and False Learning

  • No. 173: "Unreasonable fears of pedantry." → Johnson defends true scholarship while mocking pretentious erudition.
  • No. 177: "An account of a club of antiquaries." → A humorous jab at obsessive antiquarians (similar to his later The History of Rasselas).

• The Role of the Writer and Critic

  • No. 176: "Directions to authors attacked by criticks." → Johnson, himself a critic (Lives of the Poets), advises writers on handling hostile reviews.
  • No. 193: "The author’s art of praising himself." → A meta-commentary on literary vanity (Johnson was accused of arrogance in his own writing).

C. Philosophical and Existential Reflections

• The Instability of Human Life

  • No. 196: "Human opinions mutable. The hopes of youth fallacious." → A Stoic meditation on life’s uncertainties.
  • No. 203: "The pleasures of life to be sought in prospects of futurity." → Johnson’s Christian optimism—true happiness lies in heavenly reward, not earthly success.

• The Problem of Revenge and Pride

  • No. 185: "The prohibition of revenge justifiable by reason." → Johnson argues for rational forgiveness over passionate vengeance (echoing Christian ethics).
  • No. 200: "Asper’s complaint of the insolence of Prospero. Unpoliteness not always the effect of pride." → Explores social slights and misjudgments.

D. Fictional and Allegorical Narratives

Johnson often embeds moral lessons in stories, a technique inherited from Aesop’s fables and Oriental tales (popular in the 18th century).

• No. 186–187: "Anningait and Ajut; a Greenland history" → A tragic tale of love and betrayal set in an exotic locale (similar to his later Rasselas).
• No. 190: "The history of Abouzaid, the son of Morad." → An Orientalist fable (like The Arabian Nights), used to illustrate moral failings.
• No. 204–205: "The history of ten days of Seged, emperour of Ethiopia." → A political allegory on power and mortality.

---

3. Literary Devices in the Titles

Even in the table of contents, Johnson employs rhetorical and stylistic techniques:

A. Irony and Paradox

• No. 178: "Many advantages not to be enjoyed together." → A Stoic observation that life requires trade-offs (wealth vs. virtue, pleasure vs. duty).
• No. 206: "The art of living at the cost of others." → Satirical title—Johnson often exposes parasitic social behavior.

B. Character Naming as Satire

Johnson uses Latinized or exotic names to typify vices:

• Turpicula (No. 189) → From turpis (Latin for "vile").
• Dicaculus (No. 174) → From dicacitas ("sarcasm"), a wit who overdoes raillery.
• Leviculus (No. 182) → "The light one," a fortune-hunter (light in morals, not substance).

C. Juxtaposition for Emphasis

• No. 202: "The different acceptations of poverty. Cynicks and Monks not poor." → Contrasts material poverty with spiritual wealth (a recurring theme in Johnson’s Christian humanism).

---

4. Significance of These Essays

A. Johnson’s Moral Project

The Rambler is part of Johnson’s lifelong effort to guide readers toward virtue through:

• Reason (logical arguments against vice).
• Empathy (stories that make abstract morals concrete).
• Humility (exposing human pretensions).

His essays often diagnose societal ills (greed, vanity, hypocrisy) while offering practical wisdom (e.g., No. 201: "The importance of punctuality").

B. Influence on Later Literature

• Periodical Essay Tradition → Inspired later moralists like Charles Lamb and William Hazlitt.
• Realistic Character Sketches → Prefigured Dickensian grotesques (e.g., Turpicula as a prototype for Uriah Heep).
• Oriental Tales → Influenced Romantic-era exoticism (Byron, Beckford).

C. Johnson’s Style and Legacy

The titles reflect Johnson’s characteristic blend of:

1. Classical learning (Latin names, Stoic themes).
2. Christian morality (sin, redemption, futility of worldly pursuits).
3. Psychological insight (envy, fear, social performance).

His prose style—dense, balanced, and authoritative—became a model for 18th-century English.

---

5. Key Takeaways from the Excerpt

1. Variety of Form – Johnson mixes direct moralizing, satirical sketches, and allegorical tales to engage readers.
2. Universal Themes – Greed, envy, hypocrisy, and the search for meaning are timeless concerns.
3. Didactic Purpose – Every essay has a lesson, whether about social behavior, intellectual humility, or moral duty.
4. Johnson’s Voice – Even in titles, his seriousness, wit, and moral urgency are evident.

---

Conclusion

This table of contents is a microcosm of Johnson’s intellectual world: a moralist’s guide to human folly, a satirist’s gallery of rogues, and a philosopher’s meditation on life’s uncertainties. While the essays themselves are richer in detail, the titles alone reveal Johnson’s preoccupations with vice, virtue, and the contradictions of human nature—themes that make The Rambler enduringly relevant.

Would you like a deeper dive into any specific essay from this list?

---

Questions

Question 1

The table of contents from The Rambler reveals a tension between Johnson’s moral didacticism and his satirical impulse. Which of the following essay titles best exemplifies this tension by simultaneously condemning a vice and exposing its absurdity through character typology?

A. "The effect of sudden riches upon the manners." (No. 172)
B. "The history of a legacy-hunter." (No. 197)
C. "The mischiefs of falsehood. The character of Turpicula." (No. 189)
D. "The majority are wicked." (No. 175)
E. "Human opinions mutable. The hopes of youth fallacious." (No. 196)

Question 2

Johnson’s use of Latinate or exotic names (e.g., Dicaculus, Anningait, Abouzaid) serves a rhetorical function beyond mere ornamentation. The primary effect of this naming convention is to:

A. distance the reader from the moral lesson by framing vices as foreign or archaic.
B. elevate the essays to a universal, timeless plane by avoiding culturally specific references.
C. typify human folly as archetypal while maintaining a veneer of objectivity through pseudo-scientific classification.
D. mock the pretensions of classical learning by applying it to trivial or base subjects.
E. create a sense of verisimilitude in fictional narratives by grounding them in linguistic authenticity.

Question 3

The juxtaposition of "The pleasures of life to be sought in prospects of futurity" (No. 203) and "Future fame uncertain" (same entry) reveals a structural irony in Johnson’s moral philosophy. This pairing most closely aligns with which of the following intellectual traditions?

A. Christian Stoicism, which reconciles earthly suffering with heavenly reward while acknowledging human fallibility.
B. Enlightenment rationalism, which insists on empirical evidence for all claims, including those about the afterlife.
C. Hobbesian materialism, which denies transcendent meaning and reduces human motivation to self-preservation.
D. Romantic idealism, which privileges emotional intuition over logical consistency in matters of faith.
E. Epiculreanism, which advises detachment from both worldly and otherworldly concerns in favor of moderate pleasure.

Question 4

In "Directions to authors attacked by criticks" (No. 176), Johnson’s advice would least likely include which of the following strategies, given his broader philosophical commitments?

A. Appealing to the critic’s vanity by flattering their discernment while subtly undermining their arguments.
B. Ignoring frivolous objections that stem from envy or ignorance rather than genuine engagement.
C. Refuting criticisms with logical rigor, demonstrating the inferiority of the critic’s reasoning.
D. Invoking the authority of classical precedents to shield one’s work from contemporary detractors.
E. Revising one’s work to accommodate every objection, regardless of its merit, to achieve universal approval.

Question 5

The progression from "The history of Anningait and Ajut" (No. 186) to "The history of Seged, emperour of Ethiopia" (No. 204) suggests a narrative shift in Johnson’s use of exotic settings. The primary purpose of this shift is to:

A. expand the geographical scope of moral lessons, implying that human nature is consistent across cultures.
B. satirize European colonial attitudes by portraying non-Western societies as equally prone to folly.
C. provide escapist entertainment for readers weary of domestic moralizing.
D. illustrate the universality of power’s corrupting influence, whether in intimate relationships or imperial rule.
E. contradict his earlier essays on human wickedness by showing that virtue exists in "primitive" societies.

Solutions and Explanations

1) Correct answer: C

Why C is most correct:"The mischiefs of falsehood. The character of Turpicula" (No. 189) explicitly pairs a moral condemnation ("mischiefs of falsehood") with a satirical character study ("Turpicula"). The Latinate name Turpicula (from turpis, "vile") typifies the vice while the essay’s structure—first abstract principle, then concrete example—embodies Johnson’s dual approach: didacticism (teaching the danger of lies) and satire (exposing the absurdity of the liar’s self-justifications). This is the clearest fusion of moral instruction and ironic characterization in the list.

Why the distractors are less supported:

• A: "The effect of sudden riches" (No. 172) is purely didactic—it describes a social phenomenon without a named satirical figure.
• B: "The history of a legacy-hunter" (No. 197) is satirical but lacks the explicit moral framing of C; it’s a character sketch without a paired abstract condemnation.
• D: "The majority are wicked" (No. 175) is didactic but not satirical—it’s a sweeping claim without ironic or typological treatment.
• E: "Human opinions mutable..." (No. 196) is philosophical reflection, not satire; it lacks a character study or ironic edge.

2) Correct answer: C

Why C is most correct: Johnson’s Latinate/exotic names (e.g., Turpicula, Dicaculus) serve to typify vices as archetypal while giving them a pseudo-scientific or classical veneer. This achieves two things:

1. Universality: The vice seems timeless and intrinsic to human nature (not just a contemporary English problem).
2. Objectivity: By classifying the vice (like a naturalist naming a specimen), Johnson distances himself from direct moralizing, making the critique seem observational rather than preachy. This aligns with 18th-century satirical traditions (e.g., Swift’s A Tale of a Tub) where abstraction and typology heighten the satire.

Why the distractors are less supported:

• A: Johnson does not distance the reader from the lesson—his goal is engagement, not alienation. The names make vices recognizable, not foreign.
• B: While the names do lend universality, the primary effect is not cultural neutrality but moral typology (i.e., reducing complex behaviors to essential traits).
• D: Johnson respects classical learning—he doesn’t mock it. The names elevate the critique, not undermine it.
• E: Verisimilitude is secondary. Johnson’s exotic settings (e.g., Greenland, Ethiopia) are allegorical, not realistic; the names signal moral types, not linguistic authenticity.

3) Correct answer: A

Why A is most correct: The pairing "The pleasures of life to be sought in prospects of futurity. Future fame uncertain" embodies Christian Stoicism:

• "Pleasures in futurity": Reflects Augustine/Boethius—true happiness lies in heavenly reward, not earthly success.
• "Future fame uncertain": A Stoic caveat—even worldly reputation is beyond our control (cf. Epictetus on focusing only on what one can govern). Johnson reconciles these tensions by acknowledging human fallibility while directing hope toward divine justice. This is not irrational (contra B) or materialist (contra C), but a theologically inflected Stoicism.

Why the distractors are less supported:

• B: Enlightenment rationalism would reject appeals to heavenly reward without empirical evidence—Johnson’s faith-based optimism contradicts this.
• C: Hobbesian materialism denies transcendent meaning; Johnson’s explicit focus on futurity (i.e., the afterlife) opposes this.
• D: Romantic idealism privileges emotion over logic; Johnson’s structured argument is rational and didactic, not intuitive.
• E: Epiculreanism advises detachment from both worldly and otherworldly concerns—Johnson actively seeks meaning in futurity, making this incompatible.

4) Correct answer: E

Why E is most correct: Johnson’s philosophical commitments—rationalism, pride in intellectual integrity, and disdain for cowardice—would preclude advising authors to "revise for universal approval". Key evidence:

• His contempt for intellectual servility (e.g., in Lives of the Poets, he praises Milton’s defiance of critics).
• His Stoic belief in standing by one’s principles (e.g., "The prohibition of revenge" (No. 185) values reason over popularity).
• His own career: Johnson never panders—his style is uncompromisingly dense, and he dismisses trivial objections (e.g., in The Rambler prefaces).

Why the distractors are less supported:

• A: Appealing to a critic’s vanity is strategically Johnsonian—he often flatters to disarm (e.g., his dedication to the Earl of Chesterfield).
• B: Ignoring frivolous objections aligns with his distinction between valid and envious criticism (see No. 176).
• C: Refuting with logic is central to Johnson’s method—he values reason over emotion in disputes.
• D: Invoking classical authority is his signature move (e.g., citing Horace or Juvenal to defend his positions).

5) Correct answer: D

Why D is most correct: The shift from "Anningait and Ajut" (a personal, domestic tragedy about love and betrayal in Greenland) to "Seged, emperour of Ethiopia" (a political allegory about power and mortality) illustrates the universality of corruption:

• Anningait/Ajut: Intimate scale—envy and passion destroy a relationship.
• Seged: Imperial scale—power and hubris destroy a ruler. Both stories demonstrate that human folly manifests identically whether in private life or public rule. This aligns with Johnson’s core belief in the constancy of human nature across contexts (cf. "The majority are wicked", No. 175).

Why the distractors are less supported:

• A: While geographical scope expands, the purpose isn’t mere variety—it’s to show power’s corrupting effect at all levels.
• B: Johnson does not satirize colonialism—his exotic settings are moral laboratories, not political critiques.
• C: Escapism is antithetical to Johnson’s didactic project; his tales always serve a moral lesson.
• E: Johnson never suggests "primitive" societies are more virtuous—his view of human nature is uniformly pessimistic (e.g., "The majority are wicked"). The shift reinforces, not contradicts, his earlier essays.