Article #592-1 | Gutenberg Articles

Excerpt

Excerpt from The Chinese Nightingale, and Other Poems, by Vachel Lindsay

I opened the ink-well and smoke filled the room.
The smoke formed the giant frog-cat of my doom.
His web feet left dreadful slime tracks on the floor.
He had hammer and nails that he laid by the door.
He sprawled on the table, claw-hands in my hair.
He looked through my heart to the mud that was there.
Like a black-mailer hating his victim he spoke:
"When I see all your squirming I laugh till I choke
Singing of peace. Railing at battle.
Soothing a handful with saccharine prattle.
All the millions of earth have voted for fight.
You are voting for talk, with hands lily white."
He leaped to the floor, then grew seven feet high,
Beautiful, terrible, scorn in his eye:
The Devil Eternal, Apollo grown old,
With beard of bright silver and garments of gold.
"What will you do to end war for good?
Will you stand by the book-case, be nailed to the wood?"
I stretched out my arms. He drove the nails deep,
Silently, coolly. The house was asleep,
I hung for three years, forbidden to die.
I seemed but a shadow the servants passed by.
At the end of the time with hot irons he returned.
"The Quitter Sublime" on my bosom he burned.
As he seared me he hissed: "You are wearing away.
The good angels tell me you leave them today.
You want to come down from the nails in the door.
The victor must hang there three hundred years more.
If any prig-saint would outvote all mankind
He must use an immortally resolute mind.
Think what the saints of Benares endure,
Through infinite birthpangs their courage is sure.
Self-tortured, self-ruled, they build their powers high,
Until they are gods, overmaster the sky."
Then he pulled out the nails. He shouted "Come in."
To heal me there stepped in a lady of sin.
Her hand was in mine. We walked in the sun.
She said: "Now forget them, the Saxon and Hun.
You are dreary and aged and silly and weak.
Let us smell the sweet groves. Let the summertime speak."
We walked to the river. We swam there in state.
I was a serpent. She was my mate.
I forgot in the marsh, as I tumbled about,
That trial in my room, where I did not hold out.
Since I was a serpent, my mate seemed to me
As a mermaiden seems to a fisher at sea,
Or a whisky soaked girl to a whisky soaked king.
I woke. She had turned to a ravening thing
On the table--a buzzard with leperous head.
She tore up my rhymes and my drawings. She said:
"I am your own cheap bankrupt soul.
Will you die for the nations, making them whole?
We joy in the swamp and here we are gay.
WILL YOU BRING YOUR FINE PEACE TO THE NATIONS TODAY?"

"This, My Song, Is Made for Kerensky"

(Being a Chant of the American Soap-Box and the Russian Revolution.)

Explanation

Vachel Lindsay’s The Chinese Nightingale, and Other Poems (1917) is a collection steeped in the turbulent social and political climate of World War I and the early 20th century. Lindsay, a key figure in the "Chicago Renaissance" and a pioneer of performance poetry, often blended mystical visions, moral urgency, and surreal imagery to critique war, hypocrisy, and spiritual complacency. The excerpt you’ve provided—likely from the poem "The Devil Eternal" (though sometimes titled "The Quitter Sublime" in references)—is a hallucinatory, allegorical confrontation between the poet and a demonic figure who embodies the forces of war, moral failure, and the cost of pacifism. Below is a detailed breakdown of the text, its themes, devices, and significance, with a focus on the excerpt itself.

Context of the Excerpt

Historical Background:
- Written during WWI (1914–1918), the poem reflects Lindsay’s anguish over global violence and his own conflicted role as a poet preaching peace while nations embraced war. The reference to "Kerensky" (leader of Russia’s Provisional Government in 1917) in the subtitle ties the poem to the Russian Revolution, suggesting Lindsay’s hope for revolutionary change—but also his despair over humanity’s cyclical bloodshed.
- Lindsay was a pacifist but struggled with the efficacy of art in the face of mass destruction. This poem dramatizes that crisis.
Literary Context:
- The poem echoes Dante’s Inferno (the demonic interlocutor), Blake’s The Marriage of Heaven and Hell (the fusion of divine and diabolical), and Nietzschean ideas of self-overcoming (the "saints of Benares" who torture themselves into godhood).
- The surreal, nightmarish quality aligns with Expressionist and Symbolist traditions, where inner turmoil is externalized into grotesque visions.

Themes in the Excerpt

The Failure of Pacifism and Art:
- The poem opens with the speaker’s passive act of opening an "ink-well" (symbolizing writing/art), which summons a monstrous "frog-cat" (a hybrid creature, perhaps representing the grotesque fusion of war and nature). The ink-well’s smoke suggests that poetry is both creative and destructive—it conjures demons as much as it seeks to exorcise them.
- The demon accuses the poet of "soothing a handful with saccharine prattle" while "all the millions of earth have voted for fight." This encapsulates Lindsay’s guilt: his poems are ineffectual against the tide of war, mere "talk" while hands remain "lily white" (unstained by blood but also by action).
Martyrdom and Self-Torture:
- The demon nails the poet to a door (a Christ-like crucifixion, but perverted—he hangs for three years, not three days, and is forbidden to die). The "Quitter Sublime" branded on his chest mocks his failed endurance.
- The reference to "saints of Benares" (Varanasi, India) invokes ascetic traditions where self-mortification leads to divine power. The demon suggests that true change requires infinite suffering, not mere poetic protest.
The Seduction of Escape:
- After the torture, a "lady of sin" (a femme fatale archetype) offers the poet respite: "Let us smell the sweet groves. / Let the summertime speak." This is the temptation to abandon the struggle for peace and indulge in sensual oblivion.
- Their transformation into serpents (symbols of both rebirth and deceit) in the marsh suggests a regression to primal, amoral existence. The poet forgets his trial, but the illusion shatters when the "lady" reveals herself as a buzzard—his "own cheap bankrupt soul"—demanding: "WILL YOU BRING YOUR FINE PEACE TO THE NATIONS TODAY?"
The Paradox of Revolution:
- The poem’s subtitle ties it to Kerensky and the Russian Revolution, implying that even revolutionary change is violent and uncertain. The demon’s challenge—"What will you do to end war for good?"—has no easy answer. The poet is trapped between inaction (the "Quitter") and complicity in violence (the "victor" who must hang for 300 years).

Literary Devices

Surreal Imagery and Grotesque Symbolism:
- Frog-cat: A monstrous hybrid, perhaps symbolizing the unnatural union of war (predatory) and bureaucracy (slime tracks).
- Smoke from the ink-well: Writing as both creation and destruction.
- Nails in the door: A perversion of Christ’s crucifixion—martyrdom without redemption.
- Lady of sin → buzzard: The seductive escape reveals itself as self-destruction.
Dialogue and Dramatic Monologue:
- The demon’s speech is accusatory, sarcastic, and rhythmic, mimicking a prophetic or biblical tone (e.g., "All the millions of earth have voted for fight").
- The poet’s silence (he only stretches out his arms) underscores his passivity and guilt.
Irony and Paradox:
- The "Quitter Sublime": A title that mocks the poet’s failed heroism.
- "The victor must hang there three hundred years more": Victory requires eternal suffering, not triumph.
- "Self-tortured, self-ruled, they build their powers high": Pain as a path to divinity, but also a trap.
Biblical and Mythological Allusions:
- Crucifixion: The poet as a failed Christ figure.
- Apollo grown old: The god of poetry and reason degraded into a cynical, demonic figure.
- Saints of Benares: Asceticism as a path to godhood, but also self-destruction.
Repetition and Rhythm:
- The poem’s incantatory quality (e.g., "Singing of peace. Railing at battle. / Soothing a handful with saccharine prattle") mimics a chant or sermon, reinforcing its prophetic tone.
- The final shouted question ("WILL YOU BRING YOUR FINE PEACE...") breaks the rhythm, demanding action.

Significance of the Excerpt

A Crisis of the Artist’s Role:
- Lindsay grapples with the impotence of poetry in the face of war. The demon’s taunts reflect his own self-doubt: Is art just "saccharine prattle" while the world burns?
- The poem suggests that true change requires sacrifice beyond words—but also that such sacrifice may be impossible or self-destructive.
The Cost of Pacifism:
- The poet’s crucifixion is not redemptive—he is forbidden to die, trapped in limbo. This critiques the romanticization of martyrdom; suffering alone does not guarantee change.
The Illusion of Escape:
- The "lady of sin" offers a false paradise (the marsh, the serpentine form), but it collapses into self-loathing. The poet’s "bankrupt soul" is his own worst enemy.
A Call to Radical Action (or Despair?):
- The final lines are a challenge: Will the poet (and by extension, the reader) act to bring peace, or remain complicit in violence? The capitalized, shouted question leaves it unresolved—perhaps because Lindsay himself had no answer.

Connection to "This, My Song, Is Made for Kerensky"

The subtitle ties the poem to the Russian Revolution (1917), where Kerensky’s liberal government was overthrown by the Bolsheviks. Lindsay likely saw the revolution as both a hope for peace and a descent into further chaos. The poem’s unanswered question—how to end war—mirrors the unresolved tension of revolutionary idealism versus violent reality.

The "American Soap-Box" in the subtitle refers to public oratory and protest, suggesting that Lindsay’s poem is itself a performative act of defiance—yet one that, like the poet in the excerpt, may ultimately fail to change the world.

Conclusion: The Poem’s Haunting Ambiguity

Lindsay’s excerpt is a nightmarish allegory of the artist’s dilemma: caught between useless idealism, complicity in violence, and self-destructive escape. The frog-cat demon, the crucifixion, and the buzzard-soul are all manifestations of the poet’s guilt and paralysis. The poem does not offer solutions—only a brutal, surreal reckoning with the cost of inaction.

In the end, the shouted question—"WILL YOU BRING YOUR FINE PEACE TO THE NATIONS TODAY?"—hangs in the air, unanswered. It is both an accusation and a plea, leaving the reader (like the poet) to confront their own complicity and powerlessness in a world at war.

Questions

Question 1

The demon’s transformation from a "frog-cat" to "Apollo grown old" most fundamentally serves to:

A. Illustrate the poet’s descent into madness by conflating mythological grandeur with grotesque horror.
B. Critique the decay of classical ideals in modern warfare, where beauty is perverted into violence.
C. Embody the paradox of artistic ambition—both divine inspiration and the corrosive guilt of inefficacy.
D. Signal the poet’s subconscious recognition that his pacifism is a form of aestheticized cowardice.
E. Foreshadow the cyclical nature of revolution, where even divine figures become agents of oppression.

Question 2

The "lady of sin" functions primarily as a:

A. Personification of the poet’s repressed desires, offering a hedonistic alternative to his moral torment.
B. Satirical inversion of the Virgin Mary, mocking the poet’s quest for spiritual purity through sensual corruption.
C. Symbol of the revolutionary masses, whose initial allure conceals their capacity for destructive chaos.
D. Manifestation of the poet’s self-loathing, exposing his escapism as a collaboration with his own moral failure.
E. Allegorical representation of Nature, indifferent to human suffering and ideological struggles.

Question 3

The demon’s assertion that "The victor must hang there three hundred years more" is best understood as a commentary on:

A. The unsustainable burden of moral purity in a world that rewards brutality over principled resistance.
B. The futility of ascetic traditions, which demand infinite suffering without guaranteeing transcendence.
C. The inevitability of historical cycles, where even revolutionary victories become new forms of oppression.
D. The poet’s own masochistic tendencies, which conflate endurance with virtue regardless of outcome.
E. The collective guilt of humanity, which requires eternal penance to atone for its violent nature.

Question 4

The shift from the poet’s crucifixion to his transformation into a "serpent" in the marsh primarily underscores:

A. The regression from martyrdom to primal instinct, revealing the fragility of moral convictions.
B. The demon’s ultimate victory in corrupting the poet’s soul, as symbolized by the serpent’s biblical associations.
C. The poet’s rejection of Christian symbolism in favor of pagan renewal, albeit a hollow one.
D. The cyclical nature of suffering, where even rebirth is tainted by the original sin of passivity.
E. The inevitability of artistic reinvention, where destruction becomes the precursor to creative transformation.

Question 5

The final shouted question—"WILL YOU BRING YOUR FINE PEACE TO THE NATIONS TODAY?"—derives its rhetorical force from:

A. Its ironic echo of propagandistic slogans, exposing the hollowness of political idealism.
B. The abrupt shift from lyrical introspection to direct confrontation, mirroring the poet’s unresolved guilt.
C. The collision of personal failure and collective urgency, framing peace as both an imperative and an impossibility.
D. The demon’s mockery of the poet’s earlier pacifist rhetoric, now revealed as performative rather than transformative.
E. The implicit accusation that the poet’s art is complicit in perpetuating the very conflicts it claims to oppose.

Solutions and Explanations

1) Correct answer: C

Why C is most correct: The demon’s dual form—as a grotesque "frog-cat" (visceral, bestial) and "Apollo grown old" (divine but decayed)—encapsulates the poet’s conflicted relationship with art. Apollo, god of poetry and reason, is here aged, scornful, and demonic, embodying how the poet’s creative ambition has curdled into self-loathing and impotence. The transformation critiques the paradox of artistic inspiration: it is both sublime and corrosive, reflecting the poet’s guilt over his poetry’s failure to stop war. The demon’s question—"What will you do to end war for good?"—directly ties this duality to the burden of the artist’s responsibility.