Article #599-1 | Gutenberg Articles

Excerpt

Excerpt from Vanity Fair, by William Makepeace Thackeray

He wrote a pamphlet on Malt on returning to England (for he was an
ambitious man, and always liked to be before the public), and took a
strong part in the Negro Emancipation question. Then he became a
friend of Mr. Wilberforce's, whose politics he admired, and had that
famous correspondence with the Reverend Silas Hornblower, on the
Ashantee Mission. He was in London, if not for the Parliament session,
at least in May, for the religious meetings. In the country he was a
magistrate, and an active visitor and speaker among those destitute of
religious instruction. He was said to be paying his addresses to Lady
Jane Sheepshanks, Lord Southdown's third daughter, and whose sister,
Lady Emily, wrote those sweet tracts, "The Sailor's True Binnacle," and
"The Applewoman of Finchley Common."

Miss Sharp's accounts of his employment at Queen's Crawley were not
caricatures. He subjected the servants there to the devotional
exercises before mentioned, in which (and so much the better) he
brought his father to join. He patronised an Independent meeting-house
in Crawley parish, much to the indignation of his uncle the Rector, and
to the consequent delight of Sir Pitt, who was induced to go himself
once or twice, which occasioned some violent sermons at Crawley parish
church, directed point-blank at the Baronet's old Gothic pew there.
Honest Sir Pitt, however, did not feel the force of these discourses,
as he always took his nap during sermon-time.

Mr. Crawley was very earnest, for the good of the nation and of the
Christian world, that the old gentleman should yield him up his place
in Parliament; but this the elder constantly refused to do. Both were
of course too prudent to give up the fifteen hundred a year which was
brought in by the second seat (at this period filled by Mr. Quadroon,
with carte blanche on the Slave question); indeed the family estate was
much embarrassed, and the income drawn from the borough was of great
use to the house of Queen's Crawley.

Explanation

This excerpt from Vanity Fair (1847–48) by William Makepeace Thackeray offers a satirical portrait of Mr. Pitt Crawley, the younger son of Sir Pitt Crawley, a baronet. The novel is a social satire set in early 19th-century England, critiquing the hypocrisy, ambition, and moral corruption of the upper and middle classes. Thackeray’s work is often compared to a "novel without a hero," as it exposes the vanity and self-interest of its characters, particularly those navigating the cutthroat world of wealth, politics, and social climbing.

This passage focuses on Pitt Crawley’s public persona—his political, religious, and social maneuverings—while subtly revealing his hypocrisy, opportunism, and familial tensions. Below is a detailed breakdown of the text, its themes, literary devices, and significance.

1. Context of the Excerpt

Character Background: Pitt Crawley is the second son of Sir Pitt Crawley, a crude but wealthy baronet. Unlike his elder brother (the dissolute Rawdon Crawley), Pitt is ambitious, pious, and politically active, though his motives are often self-serving.
Setting: The passage spans Pitt’s activities in London (political and religious circles) and Queen’s Crawley (the family estate), where he imposes his moral authority.
Narrative Role: This excerpt follows Rebecca ("Becky") Sharp’s observations of Pitt’s behavior, reinforcing the novel’s theme of performative morality—characters who appear virtuous but act out of greed or power.

2. Themes in the Excerpt

A. Hypocrisy and Performative Virtue

Pitt Crawley presents himself as a moral reformer, but his actions are calculated and self-interested:

"He wrote a pamphlet on Malt... and took a strong part in the Negro Emancipation question": He engages in trendy political causes (abolitionism was fashionable among evangelicals) not out of deep conviction but to gain public approval.
"He was said to be paying his addresses to Lady Jane Sheepshanks": His romantic interest in a pious, well-connected noblewoman (whose sister writes moralistic tracts) suggests he seeks social and financial advancement through marriage.
"He subjected the servants... to devotional exercises": His religious zeal is authoritarian—he forces his beliefs on others (including his father) to assert control.

B. Political and Religious Opportunism

Parliamentary Ambition: Pitt wants his father’s rotten borough seat (a pocket borough controlled by the Crawleys) but is denied. The mention of Mr. Quadroon (a placeholder MP with "carte blanche on the Slave question") highlights the corruption of the electoral system—seats are bought and sold, and moral stances (like abolition) are negotiable.
Religious Factions: Pitt supports an Independent (Dissenting) meeting-house, angering his Anglican uncle (the Rector). This reflects the sectarian conflicts of the time, where religious affiliation was often tied to political and class interests.
Sir Pitt’s Indifference: The fact that Sir Pitt sleeps through sermons (even those attacking him) underscores the hollow nature of these disputes—neither side is truly principled.

C. Family Dynamics and Greed

Financial Motives: The £1,500 annual income from the second parliamentary seat is too valuable to surrender, despite Pitt’s moral posturing. This reveals the economic desperation of the Crawley family (their estate is "much embarrassed").
Generational Conflict: Pitt’s evangelical fervor contrasts with his father’s cynical indifference, showing how the younger generation uses religion and politics as tools for power.

D. Satire of Evangelicalism and Reform Movements

Thackeray mocks the self-righteousness of evangelical reformers:

"Those sweet tracts, 'The Sailor’s True Binnacle' and 'The Applewoman of Finchley Common'": The titles are ridiculously sentimental, parodying the moralistic literature of the time.
"Violent sermons... directed point-blank at the Baronet’s old Gothic pew": The personal attacks in sermons expose how religious disputes were often petty and vindictive.

3. Literary Devices

A. Irony and Satirical Tone

Dramatic Irony: The reader sees Pitt’s hypocrisy (e.g., his "earnest" desire for his father’s seat while the family depends on the income from corruption).
Verbal Irony:
- "Always liked to be before the public" → He craves attention, not virtue.
- "So much the better" (regarding his father’s forced devotion) → His religious coercion is framed as a positive.
- "Honest Sir Pitt" → The adjective is mocking, as Sir Pitt is anything but honest.

B. Juxtaposition

Pitt’s Piety vs. His Father’s Indifference: While Pitt forces religion on others, Sir Pitt sleeps through sermons, showing the hollow nature of these performances.
High-Minded Causes vs. Financial Reality: Pitt’s abolitionist stance contrasts with the family’s dependence on a slave-trade-linked MP (Mr. Quadroon).

C. Characterization Through Action

Pitt is revealed through what he does, not what he says:
- Writes pamphlets (self-promotion).
- Courts a noblewoman (social climbing).
- Controls servants’ devotion (authoritarianism).
- Fights for a parliamentary seat (political ambition).

D. Allusion and Historical Context

Mr. Wilberforce: Reference to William Wilberforce, the famous abolitionist, aligns Pitt with respectable reformers—but Thackeray implies his motives are less pure.
Rotten Boroughs: The unreformed electoral system (where seats were bought/sold) is a target of Thackeray’s satire.
"Ashantee Mission": A reference to British colonial missionary efforts, often tied to imperialist and economic interests.

4. Significance of the Passage

**A. Reinforces Vanity Fair’s Central Themes**

Vanity and Self-Interest: Pitt’s "virtue" is a performance to gain power, money, and status.
Corruption of Institutions: Politics, religion, and family are all transactional in Thackeray’s world.
Social Climbing: Pitt’s courtship of Lady Jane mirrors Becky Sharp’s own schemes—both use marriage and morality as tools.

B. Critique of 19th-Century Society

Evangelical Hypocrisy: Thackeray mocked the evangelical movement, which often preached morality while benefiting from systemic injustice (e.g., slavery, class oppression).
Political Corruption: The rotten borough system (abolished in the 1832 Reform Act) is exposed as a farce where seats are commodities.
Class and Religion: The conflict between Anglicanism and Dissenters reflects social tensions, with Pitt using religion as a weapon against his uncle.

C. Foreshadowing and Character Development

Pitt’s ambition and ruthlessness foreshadow his later betrayal of Becky Sharp (when she becomes a social liability).
His religious authoritarianism contrasts with Becky’s amoral pragmatism, setting up their future conflicts.

5. Close Reading of Key Lines

"He was an ambitious man, and always liked to be before the public"
- Ambition is his defining trait, not morality. His public persona is a performance.
"He subjected the servants there to the devotional exercises... in which (and so much the better) he brought his father to join."
- "So much the better" → His real goal is control, not spiritual growth.
- Forcing Sir Pitt to participate is a power move, not piety.
"Honest Sir Pitt, however, did not feel the force of these discourses, as he always took his nap during sermon-time."
- "Honest" is ironic—Sir Pitt is openly cynical, while Pitt is deceptively righteous.
- The sermons’ ineffectiveness underscores the hollow nature of religious disputes.
"Both were of course too prudent to give up the fifteen hundred a year..."
- "Too prudent" = too greedy. Their moral posturing collapses when money is involved.

**6. Connection to Vanity Fair as a Whole**

This passage exemplifies Thackeray’s satirical style and his bleak view of human nature:

No True Heroes: Pitt is not a villain, but a hypocrite—his "good deeds" are self-serving.
Vanity Fair as a Metaphor: The title (from Pilgrim’s Progress) refers to a worldly, corrupt marketplace—Pitt is a merchant of morality.
Becky Sharp’s Mirror: While Becky is openly manipulative, Pitt hides his schemes behind piety, making him more dangerous.

Conclusion

This excerpt is a masterclass in satire, using irony, juxtaposition, and sharp characterization to expose the hypocrisy of 19th-century moral reformers. Pitt Crawley embodies the novel’s central critique: in a world ruled by vanity, even virtue is a commodity. His political grandstanding, religious coercion, and financial opportunism reveal how power, not principle, governs human behavior in Vanity Fair.

Thackeray’s unflinching cynicism makes this passage both hilarious and damning—a microcosm of the novel’s broader indictment of a society where everyone is for sale.

Questions

Question 1

The passage’s depiction of Pitt Crawley’s religious and political activities is primarily structured to expose:

A. the inherent contradictions between Anglican and Dissenting theological doctrines in early 19th-century England.
B. the performative and self-serving nature of moral reform when divorced from genuine conviction.
C. the systemic failures of the British parliamentary system to address slavery and colonial exploitation.
D. the generational divide between Sir Pitt’s traditionalism and his son’s progressive evangelicalism.
E. the psychological toll of hypocrisy on individuals who publicly advocate for causes they privately undermine.

Question 2

The narrator’s description of Sir Pitt’s reaction to the "violent sermons" directed at him ("Honest Sir Pitt... did not feel the force of these discourses, as he always took his nap during sermon-time") serves to:

A. underscore the futility of religious rhetoric in effecting real moral change among the aristocracy.
B. highlight Sir Pitt’s stoic resilience in the face of personal attacks from the Anglican establishment.
C. contrast the sincerity of the Rector’s sermons with the apathy of his congregants.
D. illustrate the physical decline of Sir Pitt as a metaphor for the decay of traditional aristocratic values.
E. amplify the satire by revealing how even overt criticism is rendered meaningless by the target’s indifference.

Question 3

The reference to Mr. Quadroon holding the second parliamentary seat "with carte blanche on the Slave question" functions in the passage as:

A. an explicit condemnation of the British Empire’s complicity in the transatlantic slave trade.
B. a revelation of the Crawley family’s prioritisation of financial gain over ideological consistency.
C. a historical anecdote to contextualise the political climate of the early 1800s.
D. a narrative device to foreshadow Pitt Crawley’s eventual political downfall.
E. an ironic juxtaposition of Pitt’s abolitionist pamphleteering with his family’s direct profiting from slavery.

Question 4

Which of the following best captures the narrative voice’s attitude toward the "sweet tracts" written by Lady Emily Sheepshanks?

A. Amused condescension toward their saccharine moralising and lack of substantive engagement with real social issues.
B. Genuine admiration for their earnest attempt to uplift the working class through accessible literature.
C. Neutral observation, presenting the tracts as representative of the era’s evangelical literary trends.
D. Subtle approval of their role in promoting Christian values among the destitute.
E. Cynical dismissal of their authorship as a mere hobby of privileged noblewomen.

Question 5

The passage’s structural juxtaposition of Pitt Crawley’s public activism (e.g., the Ashantee Mission correspondence) with his private maneuvers (e.g., pressuring his father for the parliamentary seat) is most analogous to:

A. a legal brief that meticulously outlines a defendant’s altruistic deeds while omitting their criminal record.
B. a hagiography that elevates a historical figure’s virtues while suppressing their personal failings.
C. a political campaign that emphasises a candidate’s policy platforms while ignoring their financial backers.
D. a theatrical performance where the actor’s backstage machinations undermine the illusion presented onstage.
E. a religious sermon that condemns societal sins while excusing the congregation’s individual transgressions.

Solutions and Explanations

1) Correct answer: B

Why B is most correct: The passage systematically undermines Pitt Crawley’s moral posturing by revealing his actions as calculated performances rather than principled stances. His engagement with abolitionism, religious coercion of servants, and courtship of Lady Jane Sheepshanks are all framed as strategic moves to enhance his social standing, financial security, or political influence. Thackeray’s satire targets the hollow nature of reform when it serves personal ambition—e.g., Pitt’s "earnest" desire for his father’s parliamentary seat while the family profits from a seat held by Mr. Quadroon, who has "carte blanche on the Slave question." The irony underscores the disconnect between public virtue and private motive, which is the core of option B.