Skip to content

Excerpt

Excerpt from History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 6, by Edward Gibbon

  1782 (Written), 1845 (Revised)

Contents

Chapter LIX: The Crusades.—Part I.
Chapter LIX: The Crusades.—Part II.
Chapter LIX: The Crusades.—Part III.
Chapter LX: The Fourth Crusade.—Part I.
Chapter LX: The Fourth Crusade.—Part II.
Chapter LX: The Fourth Crusade.—Part III.
Chapter LXI: Partition Of The Empire By The French And Venetians.—Part I.
Chapter LXI: Partition Of The Empire By The French And Venetians.—Part II.
Chapter LXI: Partition Of The Empire By The French And Venetians.—Part III.
Chapter LXI: Partition Of The Empire By The French And Venetians.—Part IV.
Chapter LXII: Greek Emperors Of Nice And Constantinople.—Part I.
Chapter LXII: Greek Emperors Of Nice And Constantinople.—Part II.
Chapter LXII: Greek Emperors Of Nice And Constantinople.—Part III.
Chapter LXIII: Civil Wars And The Ruin Of The Greek Empire.—Part I.
Chapter LXIII: Civil Wars And The Ruin Of The Greek Empire.—Part II.
Chapter LXIV: Moguls, Ottoman Turks.—Part I.
Chapter LXIV: Moguls, Ottoman Turks.—Part II.
Chapter LXIV: Moguls, Ottoman Turks.—Part III.
Chapter LXIV: Moguls, Ottoman Turks.—Part IV.
Chapter LXV: Elevation Of Timour Or Tamerlane, And His Death.—Part I.
Chapter LXV: Elevation Of Timour Or Tamerlane, And His Death.—Part II.
Chapter LXV: Elevation Of Timour Or Tamerlane, And His Death.—Part III.
Chapter LXVI: Union Of The Greek And Latin Churches.—Part I.
Chapter LXVI: Union Of The Greek And Latin Churches.—Part II.
Chapter LXVI: Union Of The Greek And Latin Churches.—Part III.
Chapter LXVI: Union Of The Greek And Latin Churches.—Part IV.
Chapter LXVII: Schism Of The Greeks And Latins.—Part I.
Chapter LXVII: Schism Of The Greeks And Latins.—Part II.
Chapter LXVIII: Reign Of Mahomet The Second, Extinction Of Eastern Empire.—Part I.
Chapter LXVIII: Reign Of Mahomet The Second, Extinction Of Eastern Empire.—Part II.
Chapter LXVIII: Reign Of Mahomet The Second, Extinction Of Eastern Empire.—Part III.
Chapter LXVIII: Reign Of Mahomet The Second, Extinction Of Eastern Empire.—Part IV.
Chapter LXIX: State Of Rome From The Twelfth Century.—Part I.
Chapter LXIX: State Of Rome From The Twelfth Century.—Part II.
Chapter LXIX: State Of Rome From The Twelfth Century.—Part III.
Chapter LXIX: State Of Rome From The Twelfth Century.—Part IV.
Chapter LXX: Final Settlement Of The Ecclesiastical State.—Part I.
Chapter LXX: Final Settlement Of The Ecclesiastical State.—Part II.
Chapter LXX: Final Settlement Of The Ecclesiastical State.—Part III.
Chapter LXX: Final Settlement Of The Ecclesiastical State.—Part IV.
Chapter LXXI: Prospect Of The Ruins Of Rome In The Fifteenth Century.—Part I.
Chapter LXXI: Prospect Of The Ruins Of Rome In The Fifteenth Century.—Part II.


Explanation

Since you haven’t provided a specific excerpt from The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (Volume 6), I’ll offer a general analytical framework for how to approach a passage from Gibbon’s work, focusing on his style, themes, and historical perspective—while also explaining how to dissect a hypothetical excerpt in detail. If you provide a specific passage, I can tailor the analysis accordingly.


Context of Volume 6 (1782, revised 1845)

Gibbon’s Decline and Fall (1776–1789) traces the collapse of the Roman Empire from the 2nd century CE to the fall of Constantinople in 1453. Volume 6 (Chapters LIX–LXXI) covers:

  1. The Crusades (LIX–LXI): The religious wars between Christendom and Islam, the Fourth Crusade’s sack of Constantinople (1204), and the fragmentation of the Byzantine Empire.
  2. The Byzantine Empire’s Final Centuries (LXII–LXIII): The weakened Greek emperors, civil wars, and the rise of the Ottoman Turks.
  3. The Fall of Constantinople (1453) (LXVIII): Mehmed II’s conquest and the end of the Eastern Roman Empire.
  4. The Papacy and Rome’s Decline (LXIX–LXXI): The political and spiritual decay of Rome, culminating in the Renaissance-era ruins.

Gibbon’s Enlightenment perspective frames these events as a cautionary tale about fanaticism, corruption, and the fragility of civilization. His prose is ironic, erudite, and often skeptical of religious and political institutions.


Key Themes in Volume 6

  1. Religious Fanaticism and Hypocrisy

    • Gibbon critiques the Crusades as a mix of pious zeal and cynical greed, especially the Fourth Crusade’s diversion to sack Constantinople (a Christian city) instead of Jerusalem.
    • Example: His description of the Crusaders’ oaths to liberate the Holy Land, followed by their plunder of Byzantine churches, highlights moral inconsistency.
  2. The Decline of Byzantine Civilization

    • The Greek Empire’s internal divisions (e.g., the Great Schism between Orthodox and Catholic Churches) and external threats (Turks, Latins) accelerate its collapse.
    • Gibbon often contrasts Byzantine decadence (court intrigues, theological disputes) with the discipline of the Ottomans.
  3. The Role of Chance and Human Folly

    • Gibbon emphasizes contingency in history. For example, the Fourth Crusade’s sack of Constantinople was partly due to Venetian political maneuvering and the Crusaders’ debt to the Doge.
    • His ironic tone underscores how grand historical movements (like the Crusades) often devolve into farce or tragedy.
  4. The Rise of Islam and the Ottomans

    • Gibbon admires the military efficiency of the Turks (e.g., Mehmed II) while lamenting Christian disunity.
    • His portrayal of the fall of Constantinople (1453) is dramatic, framing it as the death of antiquity’s last remnant.
  5. The Ruins of Rome as a Symbol

    • In Chapters LXIX–LXXI, Gibbon describes Rome’s physical and moral decay, linking it to the decline of imperial virtue and the Church’s corruption.

Literary Devices in Gibbon’s Prose

Gibbon’s style is ornate, allusive, and rhetorical, blending:

  1. Irony and Sarcasm

    • Example: Calling the Crusaders "pilgrims in armor" while detailing their atrocities.
    • Effect: Undermines the noble rhetoric of holy war, exposing hypocrisy.
  2. Antithesis (Contrast)

    • Juxtaposing Christian ideals (e.g., charity, unity) with Crusader actions (e.g., massacre, betrayal).
    • Example: "The cross was planted on the domes of St. Sophia; but the altar was polluted with blood."
  3. Classical Allusions

    • Gibbon frequently references Greek and Roman historians (e.g., Thucydides, Tacitus) to draw parallels between ancient and medieval decline.
    • Example: Comparing the fall of Constantinople to Troy’s sack (homage to Virgil).
  4. Dramatic Narrative

    • His account of Constantinople’s fall (1453) is almost novelistic, with vivid descriptions of the final siege, the Emperor Constantine XI’s death, and the Turks’ triumph.
    • Example: "The great cannon of Mahomet had opened a breach; but the breach was defended by the ruins and the despair of the Greeks."
  5. Rhetorical Questions

    • Gibbon uses questions to provoke the reader’s judgment.
    • Example: "What had they achieved, these champions of the cross, but the ruin of a Christian empire?"
  6. Extended Metaphors

    • The body politic as a dying organism (e.g., the Byzantine Empire as a "sick old man").
    • The Crusades as a fever that weakened Europe.

Significance of Gibbon’s Work

  1. Enlightenment Historiography

    • Gibbon challenged medieval piety, arguing that religious conflict (e.g., Crusades, Schism) accelerated decline.
    • His secular, analytical approach influenced modern historians.
  2. Critique of Empire and Religion

    • He saw empires as cyclical, doomed by internal decay (luxury, corruption) and external pressure.
    • His skepticism of organized religion (especially Catholicism) was radical for his time.
  3. Literary Influence

    • His prose style (grandeur, irony) shaped 19th-century historians (e.g., Macaulay, Carlyle) and even novelists (e.g., Walter Scott).
    • The fall of Constantinople became a Romantic trope (e.g., Byron’s Childe Harold).
  4. Controversies

    • Gibbon’s anti-Catholic bias (e.g., blaming the Papacy for Rome’s ruin) drew criticism.
    • His admiration for Islamic rulers (e.g., Mehmed II) was unusual in 18th-century Europe.

How to Analyze a Specific Excerpt

If you provide a passage, here’s how to break it down:

  1. Identify the Event/Theme

    • Is it about the Fourth Crusade’s betrayal, the siege of Constantinople, or the Papacy’s corruption?
  2. Examine Gibbon’s Tone

    • Is he ironic, mournful, or indignant? (E.g., his description of the Crusaders’ oaths vs. their actions.)
  3. Note Literary Devices

    • Does he use antithesis, allusion, or rhetorical questions?
  4. Contextualize Historically

    • How does this passage reflect Enlightenment values (e.g., reason vs. fanaticism)?
  5. Compare to Other Accounts

    • Gibbon often contrasts Western and Eastern sources (e.g., Greek vs. Latin chronicles).

Example Analysis (Hypothetical Excerpt)

Suppose the passage is from Chapter LXVIII (Fall of Constantinople):

"The last Constantine, the pale and trembling image of the heroes of that name, awaited the enemy in his capital. His subjects were armed with the desperation of despair; but their courage was without hope, their zeal without discipline."

Breakdown:

  • Theme: The inevitability of decline—Byzantine courage is futile without structure.
  • Tone: Tragic irony—the emperor’s name invokes Rome’s glory, but he is a "pale image."
  • Literary Devices:
    • Antithesis: "courage without hope, zeal without discipline."
    • Metaphor: Constantinople as a dying body (subjects "armed with desperation").
  • Historical Context:
    • Gibbon blames centuries of decay (not just Mehmed II’s strength) for the fall.
    • Contrasts with his admiration for the Ottomans’ discipline.
  • Significance:
    • Reinforces his cyclical view of history—even great empires end in weakness and chaos.

Conclusion

Gibbon’s Decline and Fall is a masterpiece of historical irony, blending scholarship, literature, and philosophy. Volume 6, with its focus on the Crusades, Byzantium’s fall, and Rome’s ruins, exemplifies his skeptical, Enlightenment-era critique of religious conflict and imperial overreach. His prose—rich in antithesis, allusion, and dramatic narrative—makes history both an intellectual and emotional experience.

If you provide a specific excerpt, I can give a line-by-line analysis tailored to its themes and devices!