Gutenberg Articles

Appearance

Excerpt ​

Excerpt from The Story of the Amulet, by E. Nesbit

There were once four children who spent their summer holidays in a
white house, happily situated between a sandpit and a chalkpit. One day
they had the good fortune to find in the sandpit a strange creature.
Its eyes were on long horns like snail’s eyes, and it could move them
in and out like telescopes. It had ears like a bat’s ears, and its
tubby body was shaped like a spider’s and covered with thick soft
fur—and it had hands and feet like a monkey’s. It told the
children—whose names were Cyril, Robert, Anthea, and Jane—that it was a
Psammead or sand-fairy. (Psammead is pronounced Sammy-ad.) It was old,
old, old, and its birthday was almost at the very beginning of
everything. And it had been buried in the sand for thousands of years.
But it still kept its fairylikeness, and part of this fairylikeness was
its power to give people whatever they wished for. You know fairies
have always been able to do this. Cyril, Robert, Anthea, and Jane now
found their wishes come true; but, somehow, they never could think of
just the right things to wish for, and their wishes sometimes turned
out very oddly indeed. In the end their unwise wishings landed them in
what Robert called “a very tight place indeed”, and the Psammead
consented to help them out of it in return for their promise never
never to ask it to grant them any more wishes, and never to tell anyone
about it, because it did not want to be bothered to give wishes to
anyone ever any more. At the moment of parting Jane said politely—

“I wish we were going to see you again some day.”

And the Psammead, touched by this friendly thought, granted the wish.
The book about all this is called Five Children and It, and it ends
up in a most tiresome way by saying—

Explanation ​

This excerpt from The Story of the Amulet (1906) by Edith Nesbit serves as a recap and transition from her earlier novel, Five Children and It (1902), while introducing the premise for the sequel. Below is a detailed breakdown of the passage, focusing on its narrative function, themes, literary devices, and significance—primarily through close analysis of the text itself.

1. Context and Narrative Function ​

  • Source & Sequel Setup: The excerpt is the opening of The Story of the Amulet, which follows the same four children (Cyril, Robert, Anthea, and Jane) after their adventures in Five Children and It. Nesbit uses this passage to:

    • Recap the prior book for readers unfamiliar with it (or as a refresher).
    • Reintroduce the Psammead, the magical sand-fairy, and its rules.
    • Foreshadow the new conflict: The children’s "unwise wishings" led to trouble before, hinting that their return to the Psammead in this sequel may not be straightforward.
    • Explain the sequel’s premise: Jane’s polite farewell wish—"I wish we were going to see you again some day"—is granted, setting up the new story.

  • Tone & Audience: Nesbit’s direct, conversational style ("You know fairies have always been able to do this") addresses young readers, blending whimsy with gentle irony. The aside about Five Children and It ending "in a most tiresome way" is metafictional, acknowledging the arbitrary nature of story endings while teasing the continuation.

2. Themes ​

The passage touches on several key themes that recur in Nesbit’s work:

A. The Perils of Wishing ​

  • The Psammead’s power to grant wishes is both a gift and a curse. The text emphasizes:
    • Human fallibility: The children "never could think of just the right things to wish for", and their wishes "turned out very oddly indeed".
    • Consequences: Their "unwise wishings" lead to a "very tight place", suggesting that desire without foresight is dangerous—a moral common in children’s fantasy (e.g., The Monkey’s Paw).
    • The Psammead’s exhaustion: It refuses further wishes, framing magic as burdensome for the giver (a subversion of the "generous fairy" trope).

B. Childhood Agency & Limits ​

  • The children are active participants in their adventures, but their lack of wisdom (a trait of childhood) leads to trouble. The Psammead’s refusal to help again unless they promise never to ask for more wishes underscores:
    • The loss of innocence (they must grow beyond relying on magic).
    • The bittersweetness of growing up (their adventures are finite).

C. Politeness as Power ​

  • Jane’s polite, offhand wish—"I wish we were going to see you again some day"—is granted because it is selfless and kind. This reinforces Nesbit’s theme that:
    • True magic lies in human connection, not greed.
    • Words have weight (a recurring idea in her work, e.g., The Enchanted Castle).

D. Time and Impermanence ​

  • The Psammead is "old, old, old", with a birthday "at the very beginning of everything", contrasting with the children’s fleeting childhood. This highlights:
    • The ephemeral nature of youth (their summer adventures are temporary).
    • The cyclical nature of stories (the sequel revisits the past but moves forward).

3. Literary Devices ​

Nesbit employs several techniques to engage readers and deepen the text’s meaning:

A. Vivid Imagery & Absurdity ​

  • The Psammead’s grotesque yet endearing description blends the familiar and the bizarre:
    • "Eyes on long horns like snail’s eyes" → telescopic, alien.
    • "Ears like a bat’s ears" → nocturnal, eerie.
    • "Tubby body shaped like a spider’s and covered with thick soft fur" → uncanny, cuddly yet monstrous.
    • "Hands and feet like a monkey’s" → mischievous, human-like.
    • This defamiliarization makes the creature memorable and hints at its ancient, otherworldly nature.

B. Irony & Understatement ​

  • "Their wishes sometimes turned out very oddly indeed" → Litotes (understatement for comic effect; the wishes were often disastrous).
  • "A very tight place indeed" → Robert’s colloquial phrasing adds humor while downplaying the severity.
  • "The book about all this... ends up in a most tiresome way" → Metafictional irony, breaking the fourth wall to critique her own ending.

C. Repetition for Emphasis ​

  • "Never never to ask it to grant them any more wishes" → The double "never" stresses the finality of the Psammead’s decision.
  • "Old, old, old" → Triple repetition emphasizes its primordial age.

D. Direct Address ​

  • "You know fairies have always been able to do this." → Engages the reader, assuming shared knowledge of fairy tales while subverting expectations (since the Psammead is tired of granting wishes).

E. Foreshadowing ​

  • The children’s past mistakes ("unwise wishings") hint that their return to the Psammead in this sequel may not be simple or risk-free.
  • The Psammead’s reluctance to grant wishes suggests that any new magic will come with strict conditions.

4. Significance of the Passage ​

A. As a Sequel Hook ​

  • The excerpt bridges the two books, using Jane’s accidental wish to justify the new story. This is a clever narrative device—it feels organic rather than forced.
  • The Psammead’s weariness adds stakes: the children must earn its help this time, raising tension.

B. Subversion of Fairy-Tale Tropes ​

  • Unlike traditional fairies (e.g., in Cinderella), the Psammead is:
    • Not benevolent by default (it’s annoyed by the children’s demands).
    • Bound by rules (it can’t grant infinite wishes).
    • A creature of limits, reflecting Nesbit’s realistic portrayal of magic (unlike, say, a genie with unlimited power).
  • This demythologizes fairies, making them flawed and relatable.

C. Childhood vs. Adulthood ​

  • The children’s impulsive wishes represent childish desires, while the Psammead’s refusal to indulge them mirrors adult boundaries.
  • The sequel’s premise—returning to the Psammead under new terms—suggests a maturation of the characters (and the reader).

D. Nesbit’s Influence on Fantasy ​

  • Nesbit’s blend of humor, domestic realism, and magic paved the way for later children’s fantasy (e.g., Harry Potter, Narnia).
  • The Psammead’s grumpy, rule-bound nature foreshadows creatures like Howl’s Fire Demon (Diana Wynne Jones) or the Djinn in The Bartimaeus Trilogy.
  • The wish-granting gone wrong trope is now a staple (e.g., The Twilight Zone, Wish Dragon).

5. Close Reading of Key Lines ​

  1. "Its eyes were on long horns like snail’s eyes, and it could move them in and out like telescopes."

    • Scientific whimsy: The comparison to telescopes gives the creature a mechanical, almost steampunk quality, blending magic and invention (a hallmark of Nesbit’s work).
    • Uncanny effect: Snail eyes are slow and alien, making the Psammead feel both ancient and strange.

  2. "It was old, old, old, and its birthday was almost at the very beginning of everything."

    • Mythic time: The Psammead is older than humanity, tying it to creation myths.
    • Contrast with children: Their summer holidays are fleeting; the Psammead is eternal.

  3. "Their wishes sometimes turned out very oddly indeed."

    • Understatement: The wishes were often catastrophic (e.g., in Five Children and It, they wish for beauty and become unrecognizable, or for wings and get stuck on a church spire).
    • Theme of unintended consequences: A core idea in Nesbit’s work (and later in The Monkey’s Paw).

  4. "I wish we were going to see you again some day."

    • Politeness as magic: Unlike their earlier greedy or foolish wishes, this one is selfless and kind, so it’s granted.
    • Narrative function: This offhand remark becomes the catalyst for the sequel, showing how small words can have big effects.

  5. "The book about all this... ends up in a most tiresome way..."

    • Metafiction: Nesbit breaks the fourth wall, acknowledging the artificiality of story endings.
    • Humor: The "tiresome" ending is her own, poking fun at the contrived resolutions of children’s stories.

6. Why This Passage Matters ​

  • Sets up the sequel’s conflict: The children must prove they’ve learned from their mistakes to earn the Psammead’s help again.
  • Reinforces Nesbit’s themes: Magic has rules, wishes have consequences, and kindness matters more than power.
  • Showcases her style: Witty, conversational, and layered with meaning, appealing to both children and adults.
  • Legacy: This wish-granting-gone-wrong premise has influenced a century of fantasy, from The Twilight Zone to Stardust.

Final Thoughts ​

This excerpt is a masterclass in sequel setup. Nesbit recaps, teases, and deepens her world in just a few paragraphs, using humor, irony, and vivid imagery to draw readers in. The Psammead—grumpy, ancient, and magical—is one of the most original fairy creatures in literature, and its reluctance to grant wishes makes the children’s return to it fraught with tension. The passage also subtly critiques fairy-tale logic, showing that magic is not a solution but a complication—a theme that resonates far beyond children’s stories.

Would you like a deeper dive into any specific aspect, such as comparisons to other wish-granting tales or Nesbit’s broader influence?